Holiday spirit hinges on taxes, jobless benefits

Economists urge lame-duck Congress to tread carefully

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

The important Christmas spending season got off to a promising start this weekend, but the lame-duck Congress and President Obama would play the Grinch if theyre unable to agree on extensions of unemployment benefits and the Bush-era tax cuts.

Although retailers report that consumer spirits are up and shoppers are in more of a buying mood after two years of dismal Christmas sales, analysts say yanking the critical supports out from under consumers will trigger big setbacks in the economy in coming weeks.

“The hit to personal income - and even more importantly to consumer confidence - could make for a tough holiday season,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, who estimates that every $1 spent on unemployment benefits generates about $1.61 in economic growth.

This week, people who have been out of work more than six months start losing their extended unemployment benefits if Congress does not renew them. By Christmas, nearly 2 million people will have lost this primary source of income, the Labor Department estimates.

While a few people would go out and find jobs if they lose the benefits, Mr. Zandi said, most of those collecting checks will be unable to find work because there simply aren’t enough jobs.

A group of 30 prominent economists, including former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, wrote political leaders Tuesday urging the extension of unemployment benefits, noting that it is a “sensible” way to maintain spending in the economy and it would add to the deficit only temporarily until people find jobs.

The average unemployment check of about $300 is usually spent right away on groceries, gasoline and other necessities, providing an immediate cash infusion of about $5 billion a month for the economy.

Republicans have held up the legislation, insisting that it be offset by cuts elsewhere in the budget.

While the expiration of jobless benefits this week poses an obstacle for the economy, a far greater threat looms at the beginning of 2011 when $200 billion worth of tax cuts expire and tax rates revert to levels that prevailed in the 1990s.

Economists say that setback would be so great that it could throw the economy back into recession.

Mr. Zandi said it would be a “serious misstep by the Obama administration and Congress” to let all the tax cuts expire, but investors and businesses are worried that the deep divide between Democrats and Republicans on the issue will keep them in gridlock.

“The uncertainty over how all this will work out is already weighing on business investment and hiring, and if policymakers fail to act in the next few weeks, it could very well undermine confidence enough to derail the recovery,” he said.

Mr. Obama wants to make the tax cuts for households earning less than $250,000 permanent, while Republicans are holding out for an extension of all the tax cuts, including those for wealthier people.

David A. Levy of the Jerome Levy Economics Institute said the still-weak economy would reel from a massive increase in taxes early next year, despite a recent pickup in consumer spending and sentiment that bodes well for the holiday season.

He is assuming that political leaders know they have to avert an economic disaster and will agree to at least temporarily extend the Bush tax cuts and “fix” the alternative minimum tax that hits upper-income taxpayers. But if they don’t, that would “kill the expansion,” he said.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks