NEW DELHI | President Obama moved to cement the U.S. alliance with India, endorsing on Monday his host’s bid for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council as recognition of the country’s growing political, economic and military clout.
But in a speech to India’s parliament, Mr. Obama also criticized the world’s largest democracy for failing to denounce human rights abuses in neighboring Burma.
Mr. Obama made the symbolic gesture on the final day of a high-profile three-day visit, during which he sought to deepen the two nation’s economic ties and bolster Indian support for U.S. efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan. He also pledged American assistance in resolving the conflict over the disputed territory of Kashmir, but warned that the U.S. “cannot impose a solution to these problems.”
Describing the U.S.-India relationship as “one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century,” Mr. Obama told Indian lawmakers they have his backing in their bid to join the five-member U.N. Security Council, although it’s not clear when the organization is likely to reconsider its structure.
“The just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate,” he said. “That is why I can say today, in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed United Nations Security Council that includes India as a permanent member.”
Five powers — the U.S., England, France, China and Russia — have permanent seats on the Security Council and a right to veto Security Council resolutions. The lineup has not changed since the post-World War II formation of the world body.
India, Japan, Germany and Brazil have all made the case for a permanent seat. But Washington had only previously endorsed Japan’s bid. China, India’s main rival for power and clout in Asia, has long opposed India’s Security Council ambitions.
With bilateral ties warming rapidly since the Clinton administration, Mr. Obama has made a point of emphasizing the importance of India to both the security and the success of the United States. Coinciding with Mr. Obama’s visit, executives from the two countries have agreed to nearly $15 billion in new business deals, according to the White House, which said more than $9 billion of that will come from U.S. exports, supporting 53,670 jobs.
In a joint press conference with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Mr. Obama stressed that increased trade with India will not come at the expense of U.S. workers, stressing the partnership as a “win-win” for both countries.
“I want to be able to say to the American people when they ask me, well, ‘Why are you spending time with India, aren’t they taking our jobs?’ I want to be able to say, actually, ‘You know what, they just created 50,000 jobs,’ ” Mr. Obama told reporters. “And that’s why we shouldn’t be resorting to protectionist measures. We shouldn’t be thinking that it’s just a one-way street.”
Mr. Singh likewise defended his country’s burgeoning technology industry, saying, “India is not in the business of stealing jobs” from the U.S., but rather improving the “productivity” of the American economy through outsourcing.
On the thorny topic of Pakistan - which was home to the gunmen behind the November 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks - Mr. Obama told parliament that his administration will “insist to Pakistan’s leaders that terrorist safe havens within their borders are unacceptable, and that the terrorists behind the Mumbai attacks be brought to justice.”
Mr. Obama pledged U.S. help in addressing the disagreement over Kashmir, the region at the core of India’s dispute with Pakistan, but noted that the U.S. role would be limited. India has long resisted any proposal for outside mediation of the dispute, from Washington or anywhere else.
“The United States cannot impose a solution to these problems, but I’ve indicated to Prime Minister Singh that we are happy to play any role that the parties think is appropriate in reducing these tensions,” he said.
Mr. Singh said in a joint press conference with Mr. Obama that while he thinks a strong, moderate Pakistan is in the interest of India and the wider region, India can’t engage in talks as long as Pakistan’s “terror machine is as active as ever before.”View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Kara Rowland, White House reporter for The Washington Times, is a D.C.-area native. She graduated from the University of Virginia, where she studied American government and spent nearly all her waking hours working as managing editor of the Cavalier Daily, UVa.’s student newspaper.
Her interest in political reporting was piqued by an internship at Roll Call the summer before her ...
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Reviews, insights and commentary from an eclectic observer.
Join the Communities. We want to hear from you.
How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?
Life lessons, adventures, people places and observations as I undertake my personal quest to travel to 100 or more countries before I die.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall