- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
SGT. SHAFT: How to find proof of ‘boots on the ground’
Question of the Day
Dear Sgt Shaft:
My name is Carol. My husband, Ralph, died from lung cancer at age 42. He served in the USAF from 1961-1964 as an aircraft mechanic. During 1964, he was sent TDY (on temporary duty status) from the Philippines to Vietnam. Ralph talked about his time in Vietnam often. I did not find out about benefits for spouses/family of military personnel exposed to Agent Orange until a few years ago.
Since that time I have been trying to find proof of “boots on ground” to prove my claim. Nothing shows on his DD214 about Vietnam, but I found a DD215 with the following information, which I have since offered to the military as proof. However, I am still trying to collect evidence to present at my hearing and wonder if you might be able to assist me.
Enclosed with a set of military records I received from St. Louis was a copy of a letter written by Ralph Huey on Aug. 16, 1965 (copy enclosed) to the Air Force Reserve Records Center in Denver. His letter requests recognition for the 83/84 days he spent in Vietnam. He requests in his letter a medal for this service and also a correction to his DD214 to indicate the time spent in Vietnam.
Pursuant to his letter, Ralph received a DD215 (copy enclosed), Correction to DD Form 214, on which he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and also received a “correction to his military records filed August 16, 1965 by individual.” You will note the date on the DD215 is the exact same date of Ralph’s letter. Ralph asked the USAF for a medal and he got it. He asked for recognition of his time in Vietnam and he got it, all on the DD215.
I feel that this is undeniable proof that the USAF recognized. Thank you in advance for your assistance. I certainly appreciate anything you can offer.
Via the Internet
Each case is unique, but there are multiple forms of supporting documentation that could be beneficial in cases such as yours.
Since you husband was apparently assigned to a unit and base outside Vietnam and made trips into Vietnam on temporary duty (TDY) status, a search of personnel and finance records might be beneficial. Any form of contemporaneous TDY order, copy of a travel voucher for TDY funds, finance or payroll records showing payment for TDY to Vietnam or other personnel records documenting that your husband was in Vietnam would resolve the issue.
Other personnel records could include performance appraisals discussing the TDY periods or a letter of commendation or appreciation for the duty performed in Vietnam, preferably showing the dates of that service, would be helpful. Additionally, if he was assigned as part of a flight crew of a particular aircraft, flight records of that aircraft could help. Lastly, any unit records, morning reports, daily personnel change reports, etc, may show, by name, the personnel of the unit that were TDY on any given day and the location of that temporary duty.
Kudos to the Veterans of Foreign Wars for questioning the powers that be concerning the rights of military voters to have their votes count. The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act was enacted in 1986 to protect the rights of military service members to vote in federal elections regardless of where they were stationed.
The passage of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act of 2009 was meant to provide even greater protections to those serving, their families, and other Americans overseas.
So why after the military absentee voting debacles of the past few elections cycles are a number of states still failing their service members, and why is the Department of Justice more interested in cutting deals than hitting these states where it would hurt — with fines?
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's widow seeks information regarding husband's benefits
- SGT. SHAFT: Divorced veteran seeks help getting full retirement benefits back
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's wife seeks help for husband with multiple sclerosis
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's spouse will be able to continue on TRICARE Prime until age 65
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's medical claim held up at VA
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world