- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Senator seeks talks in Congress on fetal pain
OMAHA, Neb. | Bolstered by the passage of unique abortion restrictions in his home state of Nebraska, U.S. Sen. Mike Johanns is pushing for a new federal discussion of the notion of fetal pain.
Although doctors are at odds about when during development a fetus can feel pain, it’s an issue that could change the way abortions are regulated in the U.S.
The Nebraska law that takes effect Friday bans abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy based on the idea of fetal pain, a departure from the standard of viability — when the fetus could survive outside the womb, generally considered to be between 22 and 24 weeks — established by the 1973 landmark ruling in Roe v. Wade.
Legislation recently reintroduced by Mr. Johanns doesn’t go that far. It would require women seeking abortions after 20 weeks to be told the fetus could feel pain and allow them to request anesthesia for the fetus. The measure was first proposed by Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback in 2004 and has been reintroduced every year since.
“How does anybody — pro-life or pro-choice — oppose this?” asked Mr. Johanns, a Republican. “If the baby feels pain … then it is an issue of human compassion.”
Critics say the proposal is based on false science.
Vicki Saporta, president of the National Abortion Federation, a group representing North American abortion providers, said such legislation “keeps resurfacing but it has not moved forward — and should not move forward — since there is no credible scientific evidence to support the bill.”
Testimony at a 2005 congressional hearing — with some doctors saying fetuses could feel pain and others saying they could not — suggests the medical community hasn’t reached consensus on when during development a fetus can feel fetal pain. That testimony was cited in the Nebraska Legislature as it debated the bill.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says it knows of no legitimate evidence showing a fetus can ever experience pain. It says the brain of a fetus begins its final stage of development between the 20th and 40th weeks of pregnancy, and that certain hormones that develop in the final trimester also must be present for it to feel pain. It’s not known exactly when those hormones form.
Abortion opponents are preparing to introduce laws similar to Nebraska’s in other states. Julie Schmit-Albin, executive director of Nebraska Right to Life, which worked with state lawmakers on the new law, gave a presentation to her counterparts from other states during the National Right to Life convention in June.
Mary Spaulding Balch, the legislative director for National Right to Life, said there’s interest from several states about introducing similar legislation next session. She declined to name those states.
Ten states — Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Utah — address the idea of fetal pain in counseling information provided to women seeking abortions, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. In some states, that information only goes to women who are at least 20 weeks pregnant.
Mr. Johanns said he stopped short of a federal bill mirroring Nebraska’s new law because “I don’t think the U.S. Senate is as pro-life as the Nebraska unicameral [Legislature]. I think we saw that with the health care debate.”
In Nebraska, threats of a legal challenge to the new law have not materialized so far.
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- ICT trade mission to Azerbaijan successfully completed
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
- JACOBS: Prepare for a fight on driverless vehicles
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Inside China: Ukraine gets nuke umbrella
- White House faces press revolt over access to Obama's South Africa flight
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow