- The Washington Times - Wednesday, October 27, 2010


This is your brain on Armani? Whether Jon Stewart likes it or not, his “Restore Sanity” parody rally at the national Mall on Saturday has attracted political agendas. Indeed, the 30,000-member GovLoop social network plans to stage a “Government Doesn’t Suck” countermarch to “put a human face on bureaucracy,” says organizer Stephen Peteritas. But wait. Activists who support the legalization of marijuana also will step out, and in their swankiest duds. “Supporters will march in business suits - not Birkenstocks - to reinforce the message that there is no archetypal marijuana legalization supporter,” says Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, an advocacy group promoting “policy alternatives to the drug war,” according to its mission statement.

“The desire to end marijuana prohibition crosses ideological and partisan boundaries; it’s not just liberals and libertarians who say it should be legal. Calls for reform come from across the entire political and social spectrum - yesterday it was George Soros in the Wall Street Journal, today it’s law enforcement, major unions and moms,” Mr. Nadelmann tells Inside the Beltway. “People who believe in fundamental civil rights decry marijuana [law] enforcement for unjustly targeting minority groups and introducing them to the criminal justice system in disproportionate numbers. Our presence at the rally brings these voices together.”


And speaking of clothes and stepping out, consider this: “Is your Halloween costume racist?”

So asks Maureen O’Connor of Gawker.com, calling into question the “Seductive Squaw” outfit, from Yandy, a costume and lingerie purveyor that also carries such disguises as “Harem Girl,” “Geisha” and other ethnic-pop stuff. They also have a “Sexy George Washington” outfit; perhaps we should demand, “Is your costume partisan?” instead.

Meanwhile, the, uh, aforementioned American Indian seasonal female decorative symbolic attire includes a headband, fringed fake buckskin bustier and miniskirt, braided wig and beads. Moccasins are extra.

“If you accidentally bought this costume, chuck it. Possible exception: You are going in a large group that includes Peter Pan, Wendy and Tinkerbell,” Ms. O’Connor advises. “Just make sure you do not lose sight of the group.”


Painful polls keep emerging to worry Democrats. From Zogby International: 50 percent of likely voters now say they will vote for Republican candidates on Tuesday; 42 percent will pick Democrats, while a mere 8 percent are unsure. Among those who have already voted, 52 percent opted for the Grand Old Party, while 42 percent were loyal to Democrats.

“Time is running out on the Democrats. Unless Democrats get very lucky by winning a lion’s share of the close races, Nancy Pelosi will be handing over the speaker’s gavel to John Boehner,” says pollster John Zogby, who conducted the poll of more than 2,000 likely voters Oct. 25 to 27.


“The broadcast TV networks have systematically skewed their coverage against Republicans and the ‘tea party,’ ” says Rich Noyes, research director of the Media Research Center. “The Democrats’ strategy to salvage the 2010 campaign was to distract voters from their record over the past two years and paint their opponents as wacky extremists. Win or lose, the Democrats got a lot of help from their friends in the supposedly objective ‘news’ media.”

In a review of ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from Sept. 1 to Oct. 25, Mr. Noyes found that by a ratio of 35 to zero, the networks deemed tea party candidates as “extreme” or “fringe.” Left-wing Democrats received no such characterizations. There were three times more “conservative” labels than “liberal” tags - out of 62 ideological labels assigned by reporters, 48 aimed at conservatives and 14 at liberals. Only Republicans faced extreme labels - both Joe Miller and Christine O’Donnell were tagged as “ultraconservatives” - with no Democrat ever branded an “ultraliberal,” Mr. Noyes says.


Story Continues →