- Associated Press - Thursday, October 28, 2010

ANNAPOLIS | Maryland’s largest proposed casino is in the hands of Anne Arundel County voters, who are weighing huge financial implications for the state and the county in a referendum on a local zoning ordinance needed for the project.

The casino, proposed by Baltimore-based Cordish Cos., would be about 20 miles from the District of Columbia beside a large outlet mall and could hold as many as 4,750 slot machines. That’s nearly one-third of the 15,000 slot machines allowed in the state.

The site beside Arundel Mills mall could generate as much as $500 million a year, with about $243 million going to the state and $30 million to the county at a time when both face big budget deficits. The operator would get about a third of the proceeds.

The ballot question has prompted intense campaigning by foes and supporters, who have spent millions of dollars on television ads and direct mail in an attempt to influence what could be a close vote.

Voters have strong opinions, and the subject convulsed Maryland lawmakers for years before they decided in a 2007 special session to let voters decide whether to legalize slot machines in a 2008 constitutional amendment.

Melody Brooks, who works in a store in a strip mall near the outlet mall, said area traffic already is a “nightmare.” She also is worried about an increase in crime as well as the potential for gridlock to chase away shoppers.

“I think it’s going to hurt the people here, because I think it’s going to be so gridlocked that people are not going to want to come to these places to even shop,” Ms. Brooks said.

But some voters say Maryland has been losing far too much revenue to neighboring states such as Delaware and West Virginia that have had slot machines for years.

“I feel there’s a lot of people that are in need of jobs and revenue,” said Michelle McDowell, 42, after voting for allowing the casino during early voting in Annapolis. “Why not keep it in the state of Maryland and local so that there are jobs for people that are struggling from hard times?”

If county voters reject the proposal, it’s unclear when and where the casino could be built.

David Cordish, president of the company, has been going door to door in communities to highlight the financial benefits, which he says include bringing roughly 4,000 jobs to the county to build and operate the facility. Mr. Cordish cites a variety of civic and business groups that are supporting the proposal, and he said a rejection of the ordinance will delay the project for at least a decade.

“I think those people who are saying ‘now or never’ are correct,” Mr. Cordish said.

Rob Annicelli, a citizen activist and spokesman for the group No Slots at the Mall, said county voters who supported a 2008 constitutional convention to legalize slot machines never imagined a casino would end up next to a family-friendly mall instead of a horse racing track. He also said the casino could be built elsewhere if voters turn down the ballot proposal.

“No matter where the casino is built, the revenue will come,” Mr. Annicelli said.

The referendum has delayed a full opening from December 2011 until sometime in 2012, Mr. Cordish said, although he is exploring the possibility of a temporary facility that could open in four months, if voters approve the ordinance.

Story Continues →