- New Mexico decides to use HealthCare.gov for 2015
- Satanists to use Hobby Lobby rule to skirt state abortion laws
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- HHS: ‘Donut hole’ reforms saved Medicare enrollees $11.5 billion since 2010
- Boston-area tornado rips 100 homes: ‘Are we in Kansas?’
- Rush Limbaugh: ‘There is no journalism anymore’
- Scott Brown struggles for political traction in New Hampshire Senate race
- California’s Jerry Brown cites God, ‘religious call’ to embrace illegals
- Hamid Karzai’s cousin killed by suicide bomber at Eid al-Fitr party
- Obama thanks Muslims for ‘building the very fabric of our nation’
Justice settles suit with Visa, MasterCard
AmEx vows to fight ‘anti-competitive practices’ charges
Question of the Day
A two-year Justice Department investigation has ended in a settlement with two of the largest U.S. credit card companies and, according to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., a bonus for consumers who might find a little extra money in their pockets.
But while Visa and MasterCard reached a deal in the long-simmering battle over how the credit card companies restrict merchants’ ability to offer discounts to consumers, American Express vowed to fight a government antitrust lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court in New York.
“Restrictive rules prevent price competition among credit card networks, which means merchants face increased business costs and consumers pay higher prices,” Mr. Holder said at a news conference. “With today’s lawsuit, we are sending a clear message: We will not tolerate anti-competitive practices.
“We want to put more money in consumers’ pockets, and by eliminating credit card companies’ anti-competitive rules, we will accomplish that,” he said.
The antitrust lawsuit challenged rules established by Visa, MasterCard and American Express to prevent merchants from offering consumer incentives, including cost-saving options such as discounts or rewards, for using less-expensive forms of payment or one using one brand of credit card over another.
The three companies control more than 90 percent of the U.S. credit card market, according to the site creditcard.com.
The settlement would require Visa and MasterCard to allow merchants to give discounts for cash transactions, for using other, cheaper credit card brands, or for using less-prestigious levels of their own cards.
MasterCard called the proposed settlement a “modification of a rule … which is precisely what we already permit.” A spokesman for Visa described the settlement as “amicable” and pledged to make “reasonable” changes to its policies.
A number of consumer groups on Monday applauded the antitrust lawsuit, saying it was overdue.
“The credit-card networks and their banks have gouged consumers for years,” said Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. “After all, everyone, including cash customers, pays more at the store and more at the pump due to their non-negotiable fees and unfair rules imposed on merchants.”
Pam Banks, policy counsel for the Consumers Union, said the case will “hopefully open the market to greater competition and greater consumer benefits.”
“We welcome DOJ’s continued attention to making sure consumers are not exploited,” she said.
But in a terse public statement, American Express denied wrongdoing, and Chief Executive Officer Kenneth I. Chenault said the company has “no intention of settling the case.”
“We will defend the rights of our card members at the point of sale and our own ability to negotiate freely with merchants,” he said.
American Express spokesman Michael O’Neill said the company will contest the lawsuit and is hiring noted defense lawyer David Boies to handle its defense. The company has described the Justice Department lawsuit as “a significant retreat” from previous department efforts to promote competition in the payments industry.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- With bombs away, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants make their play
- Medical-device company exec admits to bilking shareholders of $400M
- Justice Dept: Florida's disabled children unnecessarily put in nursing facilities
- Philadelphia mobster sentenced to 11 years as city cleans up crime
- Man gets 11 years in Philadelphia mob crackdown
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- PRUDEN: When the hangman botches the job
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq