He was less direct when asked whether the war was worthwhile, saying that will depend in part on whether Iraq emerges as a democratic anchor in the Middle East.
That judgment “really requires a historian’s perspective,” Mr. Gates said.
“I believe our men and women in uniform believe we have accomplished something that makes the sacrifice, the bloodshed, not to have been in vain,” he said. “How it all weighs in the balance remains to be seen.”
“The problem with this war, I think, for many Americans is that the premise on which we justified going to war turned out not to be valid,” Mr. Gates added. “Even if the outcome is a good one from the standpoint of the United States, it’ll always be clouded by how it began.”
Ramadi, home of one of the U.S. military’s new advisory brigades, is in the heart of Anbar province, the cradle of the Sunni insurgency against the initial U.S. occupation.
Mr. Gates said Anbar holds a special and haunting significance for the U.S. military. Several members of his staff were wounded or saw their comrades killed in the province during the worst years of the fighting.
The difference between that time and now was illustrated by the questions soldiers asked the secretary. Some of their top concerns included health care, retirement and the state of combat pay now that the combat mission is officially over.
“Any such proposal would have to be at the initiative of the new Iraqi government,” Mr. Gates replied. “We would obviously be willing to look at that.”
He emphasized that the United States still is waiting for the formation of that new government before that idea can even be broached.