Amtrak hired private lawyers for executives

Officials weren’t targets of probe

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Top Amtrak officials declined to participate in an internal investigation until they were provided private lawyers on the government-owned company’s dime, an unusual request considering they were not even targets of the probe.

Records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act show that Amtrak Treasurer Dale Stein, General Counsel Eleanor Acheson and others requested their own attorneys before agreeing to sit for interviews with the agency’s own Office of Inspector General, which was looking into potential conflicts of interest in the rail service’s 2008 hiring of a consulting firm.

Officials steadfastly decline to say how much money Amtrak paid to hire outside counsel, insisting that such indemnification amounts are confidential.

While federal agencies have a policy, at times, of providing legal services for government employees in lawsuits or legal actions arising from their official duties, Amtrak’s decision is different because the executives were told before the interviews they weren’t targets in the investigation, records show.

Andrew C. Selden, vice president of law and policy at the United Rail Passenger Alliance, a nonprofit corporation that seeks to improve America’s passenger rail system, questioned the need to hire outside firms to represent employees if they were not targets.

“Employees are welcome to hire lawyers to represent them, but it doesn’t mean they’re entitled to indemnification,” he said in a phone interview.

Amtrak, which receives more than a billion dollars a year in federal funds, defended its responsiveness to the Office of Inspector General (OIG). In an e-mail, Amtrak spokesman Steve Kulm said all documents and every employee sought by the OIG were made available.

“The relationship between Amtrak and its OIG is very positive and constructive.”

He also called the indemnification policy of providing lawyers for employees a standard corporate policy, adding that those fees aren’t a matter of public record.

The interviews with the top executives stemmed from an inquiry into Amtrak’s hiring in early 2008 of a consulting firm, Babcock & Brown, for advice on a series of lease deals brokered a decade earlier. Amtrak also paid legal bills for Babcock & Brown in connection with the investigation, records show.

Under the leasing arrangements, Amtrak sold hundreds of rail cars to various investors, who in turn leased them back to Amtrak while taking tax breaks on their depreciation value. Transit agencies across the nation were engaged in similar deals as a way to raise cash, but the arrangements ran into trouble during the subprime mortgage meltdown in 2008 when insurers backing the deals, such as American International Group (AIG), saw their credit ratings downgraded, which in turn put Amtrak at risk of default.

Amtrak hired Babcock & Brown for advice on how to resolve the lease deals. But that hiring later came under scrutiny when officials learned the firm had previously been retained by two of the same banks involved in Amtrak lease deals.

When a Transportation Department official later asked if Amtrak was getting “clean, independent” advice, Mr. Stein, Amtrak’s treasurer, assured the official that “all was well,” the inspector general’s office found.

“OIG’s investigation concluded that Stein’s representation at that time may have been less than fully candid, based on incomplete fact validation and insufficient expertise to determine whether a conflict or other risk to Amtrak existed,” investigators later wrote in a 2009 report obtained by The Times.

Mr. Stein declined an interview request.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks