- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
WETZSTEIN: A misguided prescription on abstinence
Question of the Day
I wrote a news story recently about the American Academy of Pediatrics’ new policy on the hypersexualized media and its impact on children.
The people I interviewed about the AAP’s “Sexuality, Contraception, and the Media” report loved the doctors’ diagnoses. They agreed that the pornography-laden Internet and entertainment, music and advertising industries were filling the culture with “sexual messages and images, many of which are unrealistic.”
But there was definite disappointment with the doctors’ “prescriptions” — and I felt the same way.
The AAP policy goal is to prevent or reduce premature sexual activity among U.S. children. Since sex is an adult activity, I expected AAP to at least recommend that children and teens be instructed to delay sex until they’ve graduated from high school or reached adulthood. (The World Health Organization defines adulthood as age 20.)
I also expected AAP to continue to support abstinence programs and comprehensive sex education, since both approaches can delay first sexual experiences.
Instead, AAP inexplicably told the federal government to fund only comprehensive sex education, not “abstinence-only” education programs, which, in the group’s view, “have been found to be ineffective.”
I say inexplicable because if the goal is to delay sexual debut — well, that’s the hallmark outcome of several abstinence programs. (In one program, teens delayed their first intercourse experience by as much as 18 months.)
When it comes to comprehensive sex education, a handful of programs also have been shown to delay sex. But as a general approach, the most common outcomes of comprehensive sex education programs are to “increase condom use” and “decrease unprotected sex,” according to a 2007 analysis of 15 successful such programs.
Keeping virginity an extra year is a big deal. New brain research shows that judgment kicks in fully around age 25, so a 20-year-old will almost certainly pick a better first-sex partner than a 16-year-old. Twenty-somethings are also far more likely than teens to use birth control correctly and consistently.
So I was imagining AAP would have updated its policy to reflect the best knowledge about teen sex and point the way to some real progress. Instead, with its rejection of funding for abstinence education, it defaulted to a particular political stance.
Two more points.
I think the good doctors stepped in it when they decried explicit sexuality in the media and then gave blanket approval for comprehensive sex education. Maybe they don’t realize they have just endorsed classroom “condom races” (where teams of students race to put rubbers on cucumbers) and discussions about how youths can avoid sex by showering together and watching erotic movies together.
(For more graphic details, read Dr. Miriam Grossman’s “You’re Teaching My Children What? A Physician Exposes the Lies of Sex Education and How They Harm Your Child.”)
Finally, the AAP policy fails to see that parents expect better from them.
Parents are already crying out in vain against the hypersexualized messages spewing at their children day and night. But they expect their doctors to be on their side when it comes to promoting sexual sanity in their children — especially when most support abstinence for themselves, too.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Massachusetts lawmakers OK new abortion clinic buffer law
- Mississippi abortion law can't be enforced
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Events honoring 20th National Parents' Day reaffirm family
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Iraq Christians get meeting with top Obama aide
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world