- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Obama: Ahmadinejad’s remarks ‘hateful’
Question of the Day
UNITED NATIONS — President Obama on Friday condemned Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s suggestion that the U.S. orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, calling the remark “inexcusable” and out-of-step with the Iranian people.
“It was offensive. It was hateful. And particularly for him to make the statement here in Manhattan, just a little north of Ground Zero, where families lost their loved ones, people of all faiths, all ethnicities who see this as the seminal tragedy of this generation, for him to make a statement like that was inexcusable,” Mr. Obama told BBC Persia, according to a transcript provided by the White House.
Scores of diplomats walked out of the U.N. General Assembly room in protest Thursday afternoon when Mr. Ahmadinejad made the incendiary statement in a characteristic rambling tirade that hit the U.S. for its “occupation” of Iraq and Afghanistan, and predicted an end to the current world order.
The diminutive leader said one possible explanation for the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon is “that some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy, and its grips on the Middle East, in order to save the Zionist regime.”
Mr. Obama said Mr. Ahmadinejad’s comments stand “in contrast” with the reaction by the Iranian people to 9/11.
“There were candlelight vigils and I think a natural sense of shared humanity and sympathy was expressed within Iran,” Mr. Obama told reporter Bahman Kalbasi. “And it just shows once again sort of the difference between how the Iranian leadership and this regime operates and how I think the vast majority of the Iranian people who are respectful and thoughtful think about these issues.”
The interview is not the first time Mr. Obama has sought to speak directly to the Iranian people. Both this year and last year, he taped a video message to mark the Persian new year, known as Nowruz. On both occasions, he emphasized that the U.S. quarrel is with the Iranian government and not its people.
“We want to see the people of Iran ultimately succeed. But the government has taken Iran on a path that has led to international condemnation,” he said.
Mr. Obama noted his early attempts to engage Iran came at “some political cost.”
“Outrageous, disgusting statements of the sort that Mr. Ahmadinejad just made makes the American people understandably wary of any dealings with the Iranian government,” he said. “But I said, you know, there should be a way for us to change the dynamic that has been in place since 1979, since you were born. And it turns out that so far, at least, the Iranian regime has been unwilling to change its orientation.”
Asked what will happen if the latest round of UN and unilateral sanctions against the regime fail, Mr. Obama said there “are a whole host of options and these options would be exercised in consultation with the international community.” But his strong preference would be to resolve the issues diplomatically, he added.
Hours before Mr. Ahmadinejad’s comments Thursday, Mr. Obama publicly chided Iran in his second address to the world body, but declared that the “door remains open to diplomacy should Iran choose to walk through it.”
Indeed, the situation appeared more hopeful earlier in the week, when Mr. Ahmadinejad gave the impression that he is open to relaunching nuclear talks with the West, telling reporters in an interview that “is a good chance” that negotiations would resume “in the near future,” according to Politico.
Speaking with reporters Friday, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes defended Mr. Obama’s statement that the door is still open for negotiations, but stressed that the administration is not interested in “diplomacy for diplomacy’s sake.”
“We’re not interested in half measures, we’re not interested in Iranian statements, we’re not interested in the things they may say about their desire for diplomacy,” Mr. Rhodes said. “We’re interested in their actions, and they have to come to the table” and into compliance with UN atomic inspection rules.
The White House said Mr. Obama saw the BBC Persia interview as a chance to speak directly to the Iranian people and make clear the U.S. quarrel is not with them but with their government.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kara Rowland, White House reporter for The Washington Times, is a D.C.-area native. She graduated from the University of Virginia, where she studied American government and spent nearly all her waking hours working as managing editor of the Cavalier Daily, UVa.’s student newspaper.
Her interest in political reporting was piqued by an internship at Roll Call the summer before her ...
- London Olympics not everyone's cup of tea
- Obama hits road to push jobs plan
- Brennan: Al Qaeda is 'organization in distress'
- Obama calls for the end of 'political circus' on economy, seeks stimulus plan for jobs
- Hoffa's words about labor's importance brushed off
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Steve King
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama: U.S. should 'embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq