- Air Force cadets ‘revolt’ after officials remove biblical verse from whiteboard
- Rep. Lee: Paul Ryan out of touch with urban Americans
- House votes down resolution to force Issa to apologize
- Kremlin blocks opposition websites; Kasparov fears Putin plans ‘something drastic’
- Saving trees? EPA wastes $1.5 million storing unneeded pamphlets in warehouse
- Scott Brown Senate bid in New Hampshire may launch soon
- Jeffrey Corzine, son of ex-N.J. governor, dead at 31
- Australian surfing magazine sorry for calling indigenous surfer ‘apeish’
- Records: Man in Fla. theater shooting also was texting
- The Putin problem: U.S. needs Russian rockets for spy satellites
FIELDS: Little girls and ‘Mad Men’
Blurring the lines between liberation and conformity
Two little girls I know, age 6, showed up the other day at a public pool in Washington for a swim. They were excited by the prospect of escaping, if only for a little while, the heat pushing the thermometer close to 100. Alas, they were wearing the only bathing suits they had: bikini bottoms, no tops. No go, they were told by the pool manager. There was a dress code, and no one was allowed to dress “inappropriately in a way that may offend others.” Did I say these were 6-year olds?
“Don’t worry,” their grandfather said. “They’re boys.”
The enforcer at the gate was not amused. Rule-enforcers, as a rule, rarely are.
The enforcer told the disappointed little girls they could wear their dresses in the pool, or she would find inflatable tops that children who can’t swim wear so they’re covered up “up there.” The little girls knew how to swim, and they didn’t want to ruin their dresses. They left in tears.
I’ve heard similar stories about rigid dress codes for small children at pools, and I’ve been surprised that many adults are so terrified of perverts and molesters that they applaud such harsh rules. I understand the fear, but have we gone nuts?
Our “liberated” culture, drenched in anything-goes sex (or “gender,” for those who regard the very word as something as scary as a topless 6-year-old) now demands that we cast a dark shadow over genuine innocence in the name of protecting children. We must send innocence underground, robbing children of their incorruption. I thought about all this the other night while watching an episode of “Mad Men,” the television drama enthralling millions, set in the long-ago 1960s. The ad men and their clients argue about how to sell Jantzen bathing suits. The ad men prescribe a “sexy” campaign for a “two piece” - not a bikini. The Jantzen folk want to maintain modesty; the ad men want to sell bathing suits.
We’ve changed a lot in five decades, and not always for the better. At its best, television drama holds up a mirror to a reality against which we can measure ourselves, for better or worse. The appeal of “Mad Men” is its drama-in-costume, entertaining us with retro fashion trends. But it’s also a reminder of how sexual mores operated in a more repressed time, before we made everything illicit explicit.
Few of us want to go back to the 1950s, though the decade was better than its reputation, but “Mad Men” warns us not to be so smug about our hyperactive “progressive” world. Rebellions then were about the individual, not so much about society. We’ve come to think of the two decades following World War II as an “age of conformism,” but passion in a sea of conformity required more self-reliance, more “gumption” than the oppressive political correctness that smothers us in the name of protecting us.
When one of the “girls” in the office of “Mad Men” submits to a brief sexual fling - a “quickie” - with her boss, they both regret it. They show their regret in different ways. He gives her money, in the form of a bonus, and she wrecks his office to punish him for giving her money, not respect. She has the last word, screaming an anachronism: “You’re not a nice person.” Her hurt feelings resonate today, when “hookups” reflect no discernment of what’s even meant by “nice.”
Critics speculate why “Mad Men” drew an estimated 3 million viewers to its opening episode this season. Some suggest we like to feel superior (sexually liberated) and healthier (less booze and fewer cigarettes, more organic celery and fewer sweets, more exercise and the war against flab and blubber). Others applaud the way women are no longer the “second sex,” having burst at last through the glass ceiling. The writers are canny (as well as occasionally campy) when they intrude between the actors and the audience in life parodies of the way we were. When the boyfriend of one of the “girls” in the office tells her that they should do “it” the moment they feel attracted to each other, “like they do in Sweden,” she knows better. She understands that the problem in Utopia is that the “good life” quickly becomes the tyranny of a new norm.
And before you know it, 6-year-old girl children must wear bikini tops or get out of the pool.
Suzanne Fields is a syndicated columnist.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By Bob Dole
The industrious island has proved itself worthy of U.S. inclusion
Get Breaking Alerts
- F-35 secrets now showing up in Chinas stealth fighter
- FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- USS Kidd sent to Indian Ocean after 'indication' of Malaysian jet crash
- College group's diversity event canceled after excluding white people
- Justice Department refuses info on hundreds of prosecutor misconduct cases
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Warren Buffett's son to spend $23.7 million in effort to save South African rhinos
- Military families would take a $5,000 hit in benefits with Obama budget
- Ben Carson: America's now 'very much like Nazi Germany'
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: De Blasio doing disservice to 'underdog' students
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Anti-God humanism will ruin nation
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Issue impeachment, not a toothless bill
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Put proof behind 'Bush lied' assertion
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Wind power less harmful to wildlife