Just because Congress didn’t object to a bill authorizing online gambling in the District doesn’t necessarily mean that federal lawmakers agree that the city can start running online poker.
D.C. Council member Michael A. Brown on Tuesday announced the city was authorized to move forward in talks with vendors to become the first jurisdiction in the country to allow online gambling. His comments came after the mandatory congressional review period of a D.C. budget bill that contained a provision authorizing online gambling expired this week.
“That’s not how Congress reviews controversial legislation passed by the District of Columbia,” committee spokesman Frederick Hill said. “In practice, that is done through the normal legislative process or through spending bills or riders that restrict federal funds based on the implementation of certain laws.”
Despite Mr. Brown’s announcement, made to the Associated Press, Mr. Hill said the issue has not yet come up in Congress in the form of a hearing or a bill that would require action. Until it does, he said, “There is no specific plan to block the legislation.”
But Mr. Brown, at-large independent who introduced the measure, told The Washington Times that he was pleased that the District had gotten the green light ahead of several states considering online gambling.
“Any jurisdiction likes to be the first in innovative and new legislation,” he said.
On Wednesday, D.C. Chief Financial Officer Natwar M. Gandhi, who oversees the D.C. Lottery that would run the online poker system, signaled that his office is ready to move forward as well. Mr. Gandhi has projected that the city could collect $13 million by fiscal 2014 through online gambling.
David J. Umansky, a spokesman for Mr. Gandhi, brushed aside warnings sounded by former D.C. Attorney General Peter J. Nickles in December that the District’s poker law would need to clear multiple federal legal hurdles before it could be implemented. “What’s his name?” he wrote in an email, referring to Mr. Nickles.
“The council passed a bill, the mayor signed it into law. Congress did not overrule it,” wrote Mr. Umansky in the email. He declined to answer questions about whether the District’s new attorney general, Irvin B. Nathan, has undertaken the legal review recommended by his predecessor, and specified that D.C. will offer online poker only within city boundaries.
Mr. Nathan’s office had no comment.
To play online poker in the District, Mr. Brown said players would log on from home or seek out “hot spots” at hotels or other locales within the District’s borders. He expects D.C. Lottery to roll out free games in the next few weeks to get players acclimated, before actual games “go live” in coming months.
“Congress can put a rider on anything. We can’t lose sleep over that,” he said, adding, “There is no federal law that prohibits this.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Jeffrey Anderson is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A collection of communities writers columns on Benghazi
We welcome you to the intimate and personal thoughts on the news and events we, as editors, watch, read, and discuss with our writers every day.
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Looking at pop culture, politics and social issues.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc