BOOK REVIEW: Pointing a finger at the rogues

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

By Andrew Breitbart
Grand Central Publishing, $27.99, 232 pages

Andrew Breitbart is a rebel with a con- servative cause. He grew up in the Hollywood atmosphere, was raised in a household of the conventional Hollywood mindset, used his pop-culture smarts to undercut much of the pop culture’s political message, deployed “60 Minutes” gotcha tactics to expose the mainstream media’s liberal heroes (see ACORN sting video) and proudly thumbs his nose at leftist establishment operatives as he catches them on one tripwire after another.

Defying “the script,” Mr. Breitbart rebelled, not on the left, as ‘60s convention would dictate. He missed all that, having been born in 1969. Left-wing Hollywood’s mischievous but self-disciplined problem child has rebelled on the right.

Some of his book reads like a confessional - occasionally offering more personal detail than some readers would care to learn. But it does inform us about what makes one ubiquitous crusader tick.

“Growing up in Hollywood, going to school there, where my administrators invited [‘60s radical] Tom Hayden to come speak without the slightest concern that many in the country considered him a traitor for legitimate reasons - I knew these people. They were my friends’ parents, who voted for Hayden [a state legislator] even though they owned million-dollar houses,” the writer informs us.

The author’s cynicism - already hitting on all cylinders - became all the more muscular when he watched in outraged fascination as President Clinton used illegal means to cover up high-level criminality. And that doesn’t include the credible allegation concerning the rape of Anita Broderick, which is not even mentioned in the book.

Right smack in the middle of this volume is where Mr. Breitbart’s narrative takes off like a rocket. The chapter “Breakthrough” is in and of itself well worth the price of “Righteous Indignation.”

He cites the early-20th-century so-called “progressive” era of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson that set the stage for the more aggressive attacks on American ideals in the ensuing decades. T.R., in fact, gave a perfect summation of the mindset when he declared that Progressives were wedded to “no particular kind of machinery, save solely as a means to the end desired.”

“Scary stuff,” opines the author.

“Progressivism,” Mr. Breitbart tells us, “was a strain in American thought that merged Hegel with Marxism and Rousseau,” basically a “soft Marxism without the class struggle.” For pinpoint accuracy, it might have been better to pronounce progressivism as a less-fangs-bearing strain of Marxism, but that examples of class envy are found in rhetoric of both Wilson and the first President Roosevelt.

Mr. Breitbart fingers the people who later would aid and abet the importation of cultural and political poison to our shores. He “names names” of those in this drama who arguably were serious threats to the nation’s security.

The chapter’s 21 pages track an in-depth research on the influence of such intellectual rogues as Herbert Marcuse, Theodor W. Adorno, Wilhelm Reich and their ilk.

The “Breakthrough” chapter is at its best when it traces the transfer to the United States of the German-hatched Frankfurt School, or the Institute for Social Research (ISR) funded by Felix Weil, a young radical from Frankfurt, Germany, who used money from his rich grandfather while preaching the downfall of the capitalist system.

The Frankfurt School “was really a precursor to John Podesta’s Center for American Progress, funded by the Hungarian-born George Soros.”

The Frankfurt School, from its new American home at Columbia University, soon repaid America’s hospitality by unleashing “critical theory” among the populace. That term was coined by Frankfurt School philosopher Max Horkheimer. Mr. Breitbart describes it as encompassing the idea of “criticizing everyone and everything everywhere,” or making “society totally unworkable by making everything basically meaningless.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts