WASHINGTON (AP) - Nine of the 11 members of an NCAA panel that will help decide the Fiesta Bowl’s fate attended a bowl-sponsored retreat that included free meals, resort rooms and golf outings.
The nine names all showed up on a 2008 “Fiesta Frolic” attendee list obtained by Playoff PAC in a public records request. The group provided the list to The Associated Press.
The NCAA Postseason Bowl Licensing Subcommittee is scheduled to meet with Fiesta Bowl officials this week in New Orleans, but won’t make a decision on whether to revoke the bowl’s license until later this spring. The Fiesta Bowl, played at University of Phoenix Stadium in Glendale, Ariz., is one of four bowls that rotate hosting the Bowl Championship Series national title game.
“This is a jury of the bowl’s former freeloaders,” charged Bryson Morgan, co-founder of Playoff PAC, which advocates switching to a playoff system to determine a national college football champion. Morgan questioned how a decision by the panel members can be considered credible given their attendance at the Fiesta Frolic.
An internal report by the bowl last month detailed about $45,000 in reimbursements to employees for political donations, an apparent violation of federal and state laws. It also uncovered lavish and inappropriate spending, such as $33,000 for a Pebble Beach, Calif., birthday bash for CEO and President John Junker, $13,000 for the wedding and honeymoon of an aide, and a $1,200 strip club tab for Junker and two others. Junker has been fired.
The Fiesta Frolic was recently renamed the “Valley of the Sun Experience & Fiesta Bowl Seminars.” The report quoted a bowl official as saying some attendees requested a name change to make it sound less like a “boondoggle.” According to the report, the Fiesta Bowl pays for hotel expenses, two dinners, two rounds of golf, and offers spa certificates to certain participants. Spouses’ expenses are picked up as well, and sponsors such as Nike provide complimentary gifts. Attendees pay for their own travel.
In a tax complaint with the IRS last year, Playoff PAC called the Fiesta Frolic a frivolous use of charitable funds that cost about $1.3 million from 2005 to 2008, a figure the Fiesta Bowl report said was accurate.
The subcommittee chairman, Nick Carparelli, was one of the members to attend the 2008 Fiesta Frolic. He said that in his case, the Fiesta Bowl picked up only the cost of the golf and the meals, not the lodging, and he didn’t see any problem with it.
“Those types of things are typical in any kind of business,” said Carparelli, who is also senior associate commissioner at the Big East Conference. “I don’t see those being a conflict of interest in any way for our committee members. I do think we should be more sensitive to those issues in the future, and the committee is going to be reviewing the issue moving forward … and make sure that all the members understand the possible conflicts of interest.”
Another subcommittee member on the Fiesta Frolic list was Mark Womack, the Southeastern Conference executive associate commissioner. Conference spokesman Charles Bloom said Monday that Womack has been on various NCAA committees and that his track record “speaks for itself.” The other seven either didn’t return e-mail and phone messages or declined to comment Monday.
Michael McCann, director of the Sports Law Institute at Vermont Law School, said that cases like these demonstrate why junkets often cause problems.
“Even when there isn’t an actual conflict of interest, even if people can be objective, the appearance of a conflict can really damage the credibility of the group that’s deciding on crucial issues related to the Bowl Championship Series and college football in general,” he said. “To the extent Congress and the Justice Department are interested in this, this type of finding certainly elevates the radar as to is this a fair process.”
“Any time there are freebies, suspicions will be raised,” McCann added. “The irony of it is that the players are the ones who are subjected to what many consider to be onerous restrictions of what they can receive. And yet the ones who are deciding where they would play in the postseason don’t appear to be subject to the same level of scrutiny.”
_Barry Alvarez, University of Wisconsin athletic directorView Entire Story
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
Taking a deeper look at the undeniable connection between mind and body from a writer and speaker on matters of health, and a practitioner of Christian Science.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Tea Party blasts IRS
Frederick Douglass statue unveiled
World's Ugliest Dog Contest
Spelling Bee finale
Marines train Afghan soldiers
Rolling Thunder 2013