- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
D.C.’s Internet gambling goal gets good odds
D.C. officials are optimistic about reaching their first-year revenue goal of roughly $2.2 million for an online gambling program, despite delays caused by concerns and opposition.
“It doesn’t mean anything for [fiscal 2012] as long as it gets implemented before too long,” said D.C. Council member Michael Brown, at-large independent, who put the accompanying legislation in a budget bill in December. “We know these numbers are conservative, anyway.”
The first-in-the-nation iGaming program was supposed to go live by early September,but public outcry over how the bill was passed has resulted in delays that will extend past the start of the fiscal year on Oct. 1.
Some are concerned with where the D.C. Lottery will place restricted Internet connections — known as “trusted sites” — across the city.
Lottery officials plan to allow people registered within city limits to wager money on games such as poker and blackjack in their homes or on personal laptop computers at trusted sites such as hotels, mainly so visitors to the city also can play.
Critics are raising concerns about the level of transparency in how the bill was passed and about the risk of gambling addiction among vulnerable residents.
D.C. Chief Financial Officer Natwar M. Gandhi projected that the program could generate $2.2 million in revenue during fiscal 2012 and $8.9 million a year by 2015.
Mr. Brown pitched the program as a way to generate funds for the city while regulating a hobby that goes unchecked on offshore websites.
He said the city may catch up to projected revenue if the program survives public scrutiny, despite implementation delays.
David Umansky, a spokesman for the city’s chief financial officer, said there is a “fair amount of confidence” of reaching revenue goals if the program is implemented in due time.
D.C. Lottery initially planned to roll out iGaming on or around Sept. 8, but a public hearing in June highlighted the need for additional public input.
Lottery officials scheduled public meetings for August and early September, then postponed them because of complaints that key decision-makers would be on vacation.
The new dates should be set by the end of the month, lottery officials said.
Mr. Brown said the decision to project no revenue for fiscal 2011, which will end before public input meetings are completed, is “extremely responsible.”
Buddy Roogow, executive director of D.C. Lottery, said Monday that community input is more crucial than revenue at this point.
“We want to have a community that understands what the program is,” he said. “It’s the most important thing.”
Mr. Roogow said he hopes other programs, such as new sports-themed scratch-off tickets and sales from the Lucky Lottery Mobile, will make up for lost revenue.
He also said the community meetings will allow lottery officials to give a presentation explaining iGaming and dispelling myths about its impact on communities, such as the notion that it could lead to bricks-and-mortar gambling parlors.
Supporters contend that iGaming is needed to compete with nearby attractions, including a casino project under construction at Arundel Mills in Hanover, Md., and a successful casino at Charles Town, W.Va.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama admin.: One in 10 Obamacare forms might have errors
- Obama administration knew of key Obamacare delay in August, emails say
- House Speaker John Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
- Young millennials shun Obamacare, creating risky imbalance
- Almost 1.5 million deemed eligible for Medicaid in October alone: Obama administration
Latest Blog Entries
- Calif.: Give 'gift of health' by pledging cash for the uninsured
- Tensions hit boiling point over Obamacare enrollment figures, error rates
- Young, uninsured adults vital to Obamacare are not keen on enrolling: New Harvard poll
- Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox will promote Obamacare at Mall of America
- HealthCare.gov employs a new look once again
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- MILLER: Obamacare enrollees include 101 members of the House of Representatives
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on 'outdated' agencies
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing viper
This column will cover anything that has anything remotely to do with the game of baseball, from the game itself to mid-summer trades to offseason moves.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.
White House pets gone wild!