- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 18, 2011

The political battle for the Republican presidential nomination is all about who can get the U.S. economy back on track and restart the once-great American jobs machine.

It is also about who stands the best chance of beating President Obama, though that qualification will be largely shaped by who has the strongest credentials to pull the Obama economy out of its long, deep recession.

As things stand now, according to most surveys, the GOP’s pre-primary contest is essentially between three candidates: former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, and Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota.

To a large degree, the debate over who has the best economic skills is between Mr. Romney, the presumed front-runner, and Mr. Perry, the late entry in the primary race, who has zoomed near the front of the pack by virtue of his state’s stellar record on job creation.

Mrs. Bachmann doesn’t really have a record on job creation because she has not been a governor or run a business. As a three-term House member, economic policymaking has not been her strong suit.

She valiantly fought and correctly voted against Mr. Obama’s failed $800 billion spending stimulus bill. But it was reported last week that she repeatedly lobbied federal agencies to obtain some of that money for her congressional district, using what critics said were “traditional Keynesian economic rationales” to justify her requests.

In the 2009 House debate over Mr. Obama’s big spending plan, which created relatively few jobs but drove the budget deficit to new highs, Mrs. Bachmann attacked the plan as “fantasy economics” that would hurt new job creation.

But in an interview with Fox News’ Chris Wallace, she defended her aggressive efforts to obtain some of that money for her district by saying, “After the stimulus was passed and the money was there, why should my constituents or anyone else be disadvantaged?”

So the debate over who has the best credentials on the economy and jobs is really between Mr. Romney and Mr. Perry, though each comes at this issue from different directions.

Mr. Romney has spent most of his career in the business sector as a venture capital investor with a major investment firm, Bain Capital, that sought out promising start-up businesses, providing them with capital to expand, build market share and as they grew, put more people to work.

Staples, one of Mr. Romney’s early successes, was then a one-store office supply company that eventually grew into 2,000 stores and now employs more than 90,000 people.

He worked for Bain between 1984 and 1999 when he left to run the 2002 Olympics, turning its then-bankrupt, mismanaged operation into a financial success story. Not all of the small businesses that he and Bain invested in were successful, but many were and became top employers as well.

When Mr. Romney served as governor from 2003 to 2007, he cut taxes and spending and by the time he left office to run for president, the state’s unemployment rate had fallen to a low 4.5 percent.

Mr. Perry has spent a great deal more of his career in politics, but in his three terms as governor of Texas, he has run up a job-creating record in recent years that is the envy of most states.

While dozens of states have lost jobs, Texas has been increasing them, in part due to Mr. Perry’s skillful efforts to draw businesses into a major state economy with low taxes and fewer regulations.

Story Continues →