You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

GOP factions unite against presidential popular vote push

Idea to be debated at Republican summer meeting

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

TAMPA, Fla. — The Republicans' often competing power centers have joined forces in opposition to a plan gaining momentum in the states to effectively junk the Electoral College in favor of a direct national popular vote for president.

California recently became the 11th and largest state to adopt the plan, under which states in the compact pledge to give all their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote — regardless of how residents in their state voted. If a group of states with an accumulated tally of 270 electoral votes — the bare majority — sign on, the practical effect would be that the popular-vote winner instantly becomes the Electoral College winner as well.

Critics warn that a national popular vote would be a backdoor way of amending the Constitution, while shifting the center of gravity in presidential election from the Founding Fathers' vision of an urban-rural, large-small states balance to one with a much more urban — and likely liberal tilt. Union members, welfare recipients and others dependent on government tend to vote Democratic and are mainly in city centers.

But Republican National Committee member Saul Anuzis of Michigan, the former state GOP chairman and one of the most prominent proponents of the national popular vote in the party, calls this big-city argument bogus, arguing that "if that was true, very few Republican governors in any major state would be elected."

Mr. Anuzis said that the "Founding Fathers worried about a few states dominating the process, but today the swing states do that, while at least 35 states are 'fly-over states,' with no presidential visits or campaigning in the general election."

The Constitution now gives each state votes in the Electoral College equal to the number of U.S. senators and representatives from the state. The District of Columbia can cast three votes. Nearly all of the states now give all their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state, no matter how small the margin.

Both sides of the debate within the GOP will be aired Wednesday when the Republican National Committee convenes its summer meeting in Tampa, Fla., where two separate, potentially vitriolic debates are on the agenda. A vote by the RNC on a resolution sponsored by Alaska RNC member Debbie Joslin will follow the debates.

Leading party officials, including Republican Governors Association Chairman Rick Perry of Texas, House Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky have sent a joint letter supporting Mrs. Joslin's resolution to put the RNC on record against the national popular vote campaign.

In their letter, Mr. Perry, Mr. Boehner and Mr. McConnell warned that the "states that sign onto this plan could withdraw from it ahead of any election in which their favored candidate is expected to lose the national vote, destabilizing elections even further."

They also argue that close national elections could produce contentious recounts such the Florida fight in 2000 — in every state.

"This would result in endless litigation, making it highly unlikely that a president would be able to assume office on Jan. 20," they wrote.

Some have criticized the method that advocates for a national popular vote are using. The less-formal state compact idea sidesteps the arduous process of proposing and ratifying a constitutional amendment, which require the active consent of three-fourths of the states. Advocates are relying on another provision of the Constitution, which gives states the right to determine the procedure by which their votes in the Electoral College are allotted.

Aside from Mr. Anuzis, the popular-vote plan does have the backing of at least two well-known Republicans: former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee and former Illinois Gov. Jim Edgar.

For Mr. Thompson, however, switching to a popular vote is supported by simple logic.

"We simply can no longer afford to run the risk of having a president who is handicapped by not having won the most popular votes," Mr. Thompson says on the website nationalpopularvote.com.

Mr. Anuzis' lobbying efforts have upset some fellow RNC members, but he argues that the change would "guarantee that every vote matters, every state is relevant, every town and community would have the same value to each candidate for president in every presidential election."

To illustrate his point, he recalled that during in 2008, GOP nominee John McCain estimated that Michigan's 17 electoral votes were out of reach and so stopped campaigning there in order to focus time and money on battleground states such as Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania and Missouri in the campaign's final days.

"McCain abandoned conservatives in Michigan and made it difficult to win seats for U.S. Congress and the Michigan Legislature," Mr. Anuzis said. 'With national popular vote, the McCain campaign would have fought for every GOP vote in Michigan right up until Election Day."

Delaware GOP Chairman John Sigler, comes at it from the opposite perspective, saying that preserving the Electoral College, as called for in the Constitution, is also simple logic that honors the intentions of the founders.

"To create this constitutional republic, each state gave up some rights to become part of the union as a grand bargain," Mr. Sigler said. "This national popular vote would give more rights to the large population centers in the big states."

Republican opponents of a national popular vote also note that some of the idea's biggest supporters, including the family of billionaire liberal donor George Soros, are not friendly to the conservative movement or the Republican Party. Mr. Soros' son Jonathan wrote an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal in 2008 backing the concept.

"It is mind-boggling to see a few RNC members and GOP legislators are on the same side with the Soros family to undermine our Constitution," Mr. Sigler said.

Former Republican National Chairman Mike Duncan warned the national vote idea opened up the way for increased voter fraud.

He noted that "another Soros-funded agency, Acorn, was discredited and bankrupted after being involved in vote fraud in several states. I fought Acorn and their associated organizations during my tenure as general counsel and chairman of the RNC because I believed their methods were deplorable, unlawful and would undermine the Constitution."

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Ralph Z. Hallow

Ralph Z. Hallow

Chief political writer Ralph Z. Hallow served on the Chicago Tribune, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Washington Times editorial boards, was Ford Foundation Fellow in Urban Journalism at Northwestern University, resident at Columbia University Editorial-Page Editors Seminar and has filed from Berlin, Bonn, London, Paris, Geneva, Vienna, Amman, Beirut, Cairo, Damascus, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Belgrade, Bucharest, Panama and Guatemala.

 

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks