- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
Uranium firm urges Va. towns to keep ‘open mind’
Question of the Day
A company seeking to mine a 119-million pound southern Virginia uranium deposit has sent letters to localities urging officials to “keep an open mind” before the release of studies that could affect whether the General Assembly votes to overturn the nearly 30-year ban on the practice.
Virginia Uranium Inc. says it wants to mine a site in Pittsylvania County considered to be one of the world’s largest untapped sources of the radioactive element widely used in nuclear reactors.
The letter, signed by Walter Coles, the chairman of Virginia Uranium, says an independent engineering study has revealed the “enormous positive economic impact” that such a mining and milling would have on the region, adding that direct and indirect economic benefits would exceed $240 million a year.
“I think our position has been very clear since our company was formed in 2007,” said Patrick Wales, Virginia Uranium’s project manager. “We have great confidence in this industry, but we feel we need independent scientific research.”
Virginia Uranium points to a pending National Academy of Sciences (NAS) study on the statewide impact of mining and a separate one regarding the socio-economic impacts of tapping the supply in Pittsylvania.
“We haven’t taken an official position,” said Martinsville Mayor Kim Adkins, one of the localities to receive the letter, citing the pending release of the study.
A number of other localities, including the town of Culpeper and the city of Virginia Beach, however, have signed “keep the ban” resolutions. Legislation to begin the process of overturning the ban could be introduced as early as the 2012 General Assembly session.
A coalition of groups in favor of keeping the ban on uranium sent out its own letter noting that more than 50 localities and organizations in Virginia and North Carolina have taken action to support the ban. The coalition cited a study conducted for the city of Virginia Beach that found uranium mining, processing and toxic waste storage upstream from Virginia Beach could contaminate the city’s water supply for as long as two years.
A subsequent report commissioned by Virginia Uranium challenged those findings.
The pending studies are expected to be completed in December, and Gov. Bob McDonnell is awaiting the results, spokesman Jeff Caldwell said.
“If the studies conclude that uranium mining can be conducted safely, and confirm that it would create badly needed jobs and other economic activity in the region, the governor will support moving forward to lift the moratorium and develop a regulatory program to permit uranium mining in Virginia,” he said.
The NAS will not make recommendations about whether or not uranium mining should be permitted.
Virginia Uranium flew about a dozen state lawmakers to France in June to inspect a closed mine in western France where uranium was mined for about 50 years, until the late 1990s.
Delegate Bill Janis, Goochland Republican, said he thought it was a “helpful and informative trip,” noting that the area where the mine was is similar in terrain and weather to Chatham, Va., where the main uranium stockpile is located. Opponents, though, fear that heavy rains or flooding could contaminate nearby water supplies.
Mr. Janis said he, too, was awaiting the study from the National Academy of Sciences and that he hasn’t made up his mind yet whether or not he would support lifting the ban.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Actress Glenn Close, advocacy groups prod Congress on mental health legislation
- Virginia conservative offers solution to bureaucratic nightmare regarding concealed weapons
- House retirements creating pickup opportunities for Democrats and Republicans
- Senate confirms Obama pick Jeh Johnson as Homeland Security secretary
- 75 is the new old: VA DMV study recommends fitness tests for aging drivers
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Border Patrol helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from the carpool lane.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow