- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
BOOK REVIEW: ‘Troublemaker’
TROUBLEMAKER: LET’S DO WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
By Christine O'Donnell
St. Martin’s Press, $25.99, 358 pages
There’s a wonderful scene from the first episode of “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” between Mary and Lou Grant (Ed Asner), her short-tempered boss, teetering on the edge of rage.
“You know what?” Grant asks. “You’ve got spunk.”
“Well, yes …” says Mary, trying to smile that wonderful smile.
“I hate spunk,” Grant snaps.
That seems much the case with Christine O'Donnell. She’s got spunk. It was spunk that drove her to take on the GOP establishment in 2010 in her run for Joseph R. Biden’s Senate seat. (She had run against Mr. Biden as the Republican candidate in 2008.) It was spunk that made her a Tea Party favorite. And it was spunk that compelled her to write this book, an honest and at times touching account of her upbringing and education, her life at work and in politics and her hopes for the future, all presented in fast and upbeat prose, essentially bright and optimistic even when recounting moments of setbacks and stress.
There are those who love that spunk, those who hate it and those, among them smirking television talk-show hosts, who use it to score easy points in the ratings chase. Of the frequently snide and supercilious Bill Maher, for instance, who during the campaign first fired up the inane witchcraft controversy, she writes: “I was stunned. More than that I was hurt, because it felt like a betrayal … I’d thought we were friends.”
Most recently, there was her abrupt departure from CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight,” brought on by questions she correctly labeled as constituting “borderline sexual harassment.” No surprise there. As the media’s treatment of Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann amply demonstrates, conservative women in politics are fair game for condescending sexist liberals.
But again, it took spunk to stand up and walk off that set.
It also took spunk to weather the attacks from the media and both major parties during her run for the Senate. After winning the 2010 primary against nine-term congressman and former Gov. Mike Castle, the unanimous choice of the GOP establishment, she found that neither Mr. Castle nor the leaders of her party and many national Republican grandees would support her in the general-election campaign.
As Jeffrey Lord points out in a recent article in the American Spectator, “Ms. O'Donnell was derided not only by elitist Delaware Democrats but Ruling Class elites of both the Delaware Republican Party and, amazingly in a movement that celebrates such anti-liberal Establishment stars from Buckley to Reagan to Fox and talk radio, some conservatives.”
After the general election, Ms. O'Donnell appeared on “The O’Reilly Factor” to discuss those attacks: “They just wanted to attack me rather than look at where I stand on the issues. … It could be [I was] a strong woman who had the audacity to challenge the system, and I busted up the backroom deal. I think there were a lot of bruised egos … I think at least for the party in Delaware, the Republican leadership … would rather control the way they lose than lose control of their party.”
It was just this sort of behavior by both established parties that brought the Tea Party movement into existence. In the political battles of 2010, it demonstrated its power as a new and powerful political force. And there’s little doubt today that it will play an increasingly powerful role in elections to come.
The Tea Party movement shows no sign of fading away. Nor, as this book demonstrates, does Christine O'Donnell. She’s smart and articulate; she’s solid on the issues; she has a coherent set of beliefs and principles; and she enjoys the support of a strong and enthusiastic constituency.
“Make no mistake,” she writes, “there are more of us than there are of [the establishment liberals] … They call us wacky. They call us wingnuts. We call us ‘We the People.’ “
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Joy Overbeck
Redemption by government is futile
Get Breaking Alerts
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Obama taunts GOP, takes nationally televised victory lap on Obamacare
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Elderly Chicago man robs bank to go 'home' to prison; judge fulfills his desire
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- Chavez seizes Cargill factory
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Probe Boston teen's medical, custody case
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support a modern-day Tiananmen protest
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: An honorable president would resign
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable