- New Obama adviser Podesta is against Keystone but will steer clear of pipeline deliberations
- 40 Australian adults, children found in ‘one of the worst accounts of incest ever made public’
- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bow before Valkyrie, NASA’s ‘superhero robot’ entry in DARPA challenge
- 10-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for pretend bow-and-arrow shooting
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Budget deal to get quick vote in the House
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro ‘marriage’
- Sebelius calls for review of Obamacare rollout woes
Study: Live it up and live a long life
Heredity seen as top factor
Julie Jones turned 90 in June, outlasting all of her four siblings after her longest-living brother died just over a week ago at 88.
How did she live so long? Not because she was constantly Jazzercizing, denying herself a yummy peanut butter sandwich or staying away from a fun party.
As someone who hates exercise, who loves an occasional scotch on the rocks or a chocolate milkshake from McDonald's, and who smoked for many years, Mrs. Jones says she comes by her longevity naturally. Her mother lived until she was 96.
“I didn’t do anything special to get this far,” Mrs. Jones said with a laugh.
The retired high school English teacher takes medication for heart issues, but continues to live in her home and drive on her own.
“I believe it is genetics. My sister was 88, and so was my brother, and here I am 90. All my life, I’ve eaten what I want to eat, I’ve never exercised and I have a bad heart and diabetes. Now, I just intend to keep on enjoying what I can.”
Fitness guru Jack LaLanne, a proponent of exercise through the life span, might argue otherwise, but research confirms what Mrs. Jones and others have long pondered. Nature, it seems, beats nurture for those who live longer lives, a study from Yeshiva University’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine has found.
“In this population, the environment plays very little roles. What they have is some genetic protection against the environment,” said the study’s lead researcher, Dr. Ni Barzilai, a physician who heads Yeshiva’s Institute for Aging Research.
His study, first published Wednesday in the online version of the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, looks at 477 Ashkenazi Jews ages 95 to 112 who lived independently. The Ashkenazi Jews are more genetically uniform, the researchers said, making use of them as a study population a clearer way to track gene differences.
The study group was interviewed about their lifestyles at age 70 to paint a picture of how they lived as adults. They responded to questions about weight and height to calculate body mass index along with information about alcohol consumption, physical activity, smoking and diet. Their answers were compared with those from a second group of 3,164 people who were close to the same age and who had been examined between 1971 and 1975 as a part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Overall, the study found that the Ashkenazi Jews didn’t have healthier habits than their comparison-group peers.
“Our centenarians haven’t been very special from the point of view of interacting with the environment,” Dr. Barzilai said of his research. “They smoked, they exercised less than people within their control group. It looks like in this case the environment wasn’t really very important to bringing those people to being 100 years old. It means the genes are more important.”
The findings were released as the nation’s first lady, Michelle Obama, touts healthier nutritional choices for Happy Meal-addicted children - even as she enjoys a good junk-food binge - and as late-night hawkers extol the virtues of kill-and-drill workouts as key for an ab-tastic future.
The research is sure to be reviewed by many in the nation’s aging baby-boomer population, which sees itself as more active, vital and health conscious than generations past. According to the 2010 U.S. census, nearly 425,000 people living in the U.S. were 95 or older and about 40 million were 65 or older.
Among the growing baby-boomers group, such research on aging is increasing, said Ruth Dunkle, a professor and gerontologist at the University of Michigan’s School of Social Work.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Leon Panetta named as source of 'Zero Dark Thirty' scriptwriters information
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whiskey: U.K.-born expert
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
An objective, analysis-based perspective of D.C. sports as seen through the eyes of lifelong D.C. sports enthusiast, John Heibel.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Human interest stories to feed interest, satisfy curiosity and see outside the box.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow