- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
D.C. Lottery schedules public meetings on online gambling
Question of the Day
The D.C. Lottery has rolled out a schedule of meetings in each of the city’s eight wards to discuss its controversial online gambling program.
Lottery Director Buddy Roogow said details were ironed out earlier this week before the dates, spanning Aug. 16 to Sept. 14, were announced Thursday.
The Internet gambling program, known as i-Gaming, would be the first of its kind in the nation. Yet questions about its community impact and how it passed muster with the D.C. Council in the first place caused city officials to tap the brakes on the program to pursue input from residents.
Authorized by a measure tucked into a supplemental budget bill in December by council member Michael A. Brown, at-large independent, it was not subject to hearings or other forms of public vetting.
The program would allow registered persons within the District to wager money on games such as poker and blackjack within their homes or on their laptops at “trusted sites” in designated hotels or other areas, mainly so visitors to the city also can play.
The form and location of the public areas — colloquially known as “hot spots” — became a source of contention in addition to questions surrounding gambling addiction and “randomly generated numbers” games that were condemned by some as online slot machines.
The lottery quickly found itself trying to quell the public outcry as it attempted to implement the law to gain the revenue calculated into the fiscal year 2012 budget and keep up with gambling ventures in neighboring states.
One council member, Ward 6 Democrat Tommy Wells, said in a recent interview that the bill ought to be repealed.
“I can’t comment on the council’s actions or their comments,” Mr. Roogow said Thursday. “As of now, it’s in the law. … Lacking other direction, we’re still moving forward in what we hope is the most responsible way.”
Council member Jack Evans, Ward 2 Democrat, asked for additional public input on the program before its scheduled start date in early September, based on comments at a June hearing on the issue.
The lottery agreed to delay implementation and set up meetings throughout the city.
Mr. Roogow said the meetings will allow lottery officials to present a PowerPoint explanation of the i-Gaming program and dispel myths about its impact on communities.
“These are not brick-and-mortar casinos,” he said. “There isn’t an impact on traffic. There’s not an impact on zoning regulations.”
The first meeting is for leaders of advisory neighborhood commissions, one day before the Ward 4 meeting at the Petworth Library on Aug. 17.
The meetings, hosted at libraries and community centers, will contain a question-and-answer period that gives preference to residents of the ward in which the meeting is held, Mr. Roogow said.
Each ward’s council member has been invited to come to his or her respective meeting, although the lottery has not yet confirmed whether each will attend.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Contrasting judgments on Obama's health care hours apart; appeals court calls subsidies unlawful
- New Democratic caucus will pressure GOP governors to expand Medicaid
- Insurers cough up refunds to subscribers under Obamacare ‘80-20 rule’
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Tom Petty: 'No one's got Christ more wrong than the Christians'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq