- Algerian airplane goes missing over Mali: ‘Emergency plan’ launched
- Colorado judge strikes voter-backed gay marriage ban, but issues stay
- Brooklyn Bridge flag-swapping suspects identified by nickname
- Christian woman in Sudan spared for apostasy flies to Italy
- Iraq: 60 dead in attack on prisoner convoy
- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
D.C. may be forced to enroll in immigrant program
ICE says joining ‘Secure’ required
Question of the Day
The District could be forced to participate in an immigration-enforcement program now that the federal government has issued a letter to states that voided their participation agreements and emphasized the program's mandatory nature.
The Department of Homeland Security sent the letter last week to governors of 39 states, including Maryland and Virginia, after three states expressed interest in opting out of their contracts with the federal Secure Communities program.
The program allows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to access fingerprints collected by state and local law enforcement and shared with the FBI. It was started in 2008 and has helped ICE identify and deport more than 86,000 convicted criminal aliens.
"This is to avoid any further confusion," ICE spokeswoman Nicole Navas said Monday. "We've made it clear. There's no opting out."
DHS voided the agreements to clarify that they essentially served no purpose, and that states are required to remain in the program. Federal officials no longer will seek agreement with newly enrolled states and jurisdictions, and will simply notify them when they plan to implement the program.
The program currently operates in 43 states. DHS hopes to expand it nationwide by the end of 2013.
Many local and state officials have expressed concerns that while Secure Communities removes dangerous illegal immigrants, it unfairly targets many minor offenders and even illegal immigrants who report crimes but are fingerprinted in the process.
"No longer are the law enforcement officers there to protect people," said Enid Gonzalez, legal director for immigrant advocacy group Casa de Maryland. "We've had cases of people who have called for protection and been arrested."
Officials in Illinois, Massachusetts and New York have tried unsuccessfully to withdraw from the program because of such concerns, while many jurisdictions have protested or drafted critical resolutions.
The District has staved off participation through resistance from activists and the D.C. Council, but federal officials say such displays are unlikely to prevent the inevitable.
Council member Mary M. Cheh, Ward 3 Democrat, said the city's heavy reliance on federal funds likely will force it to comply when called upon by federal officials, despite the council's concerns.
"If they do that, then we're stuck," she said. "There's just too much federal money to risk non-compliance."
Federal officials insist the program is mandatory and permanent, but they announced several reforms in June designed to address concerns that the program could discourage illegal immigrants from reporting crimes.
Critics have argued that the program is especially harmful to witnesses or victims in domestic violence cases, in which an accuser and suspect are sometimes both detained by police.
The reforms include a revised training program for state and local law enforcement officials and the formation of a task force to address possible protections for witnesses and suspects who are arrested for minor offenses such as traffic violations but never charged.
All of Virginia currently participates in Secure Communities, as do 22 of 24 jurisdictions in Maryland. Baltimore has resisted, with its City Council even drafting a resolution in June condemning the program, while Montgomery County will enroll this fall despite concerns from many of its officials.
"In many cases, it makes a community insecure," said Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett, a Democrat. "But I don't think we have much of an option. We're going to comply with the law."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Hill joined The Washington Times in February 2011 as a Maryland political reporter. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Md. drivers could face eventual doubling of gas tax
- Federal appeals court restores Maryland's concealed carry law
- Md. bill would end student suspensions for mimicking gun behavior
- Maryland Senate passes bill decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana
- Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell assailed on transportation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Hezbollah in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- FIELDS: A tale of a boy, a Bible and a gun
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq