- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- International crises be damned, Obama’s fundraising trip must go on
- Friend of bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev found guilty of impeding probe
- Train with MH17 plane crash bodies leaves rebel town in Ukraine
- Half of Colorado voters are OK with Hobby Lobby decision, poll shows
- HIV-killing condom to soon hit shelves in Australia
- Estonia pulls plug on Steven Seagal over praise for Putin
- Lawyer: Pelvic exam pics cost Hopkins $190 million
Report: Va. would not save with proposed pension plan
Question of the Day
RICHMOND — Despite a concerted push to overhaul Virginia’s retirement system for public employees, a high-profile proposal to offer them an optional 401(k)-style plan would not save the state significant money over the next decade, according to a report released Monday.
The legislation providing for such an optional plan for state and local employees was introduced during this year’s General Assembly session by Delegate Lacey E. Putney, Bedford independent, and was backed by Gov. Bob McDonnell as part of a package of public-pension reforms.
But cumulatively, if the plan as outlined in the bill was offered to state employees and teachers, between $197 million and $944 million in additional costs could be expected through fiscal 2022, according to the report from the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, the General Assembly’s investigative arm.
The wide range assumed a higher participation rate and a maximum state match, while the low end assumed a 5 percent participation and a minimum employer match.
“I would guess that the General Assembly members weren’t entirely pleased with what they heard,” said Mary Jo Fields, research director for the Virginia Municipal League, a nonprofit, nonpartisan association of local governments in the state.
Still, Virginia legislators are pushing to move away from the current defined-benefit system in hopes of shoring up the state’s pension plans, which now face nearly $20 billion in unfunded liabilities. The trust fund’s value sits at $49.6 billion, down from $54.3 billion in March.
“Defined benefit is a dinosaur,” said Delegate Harvey B. Morgan, Gloucester Republican. “Over time, it’s not going to be sustainable.”
A theoretical combination plan, which included both defined-benefit and 401(k)-style components, could result in cost reductions from $5.6 million to $118.7 million for state employees through 2022, the report said. Combined with the plan for teachers, the low cost estimate would save the state $220 million, and the high cost estimate would cost it $61 million.
Much of the existing pension problem is simply math.
“It’s unsustainable for a person to be retired at 55 and be retired for 40-some years,” said Sen. Walter A. Stosch, Richmond Republican.
Added to that, the number of retired state employees in Virginia has increased from 39,252 in 2005 to 52,480 in 2011, and the number of retired teachers has jumped from 50,532 to 71,010.
But state lawmakers also have long approved contribution rates below what the retirement system’s actuary has recommended. Since 1992, the state employees’ plan rates have been fully funded in only four years, and the teachers’ plan rates have been funded in only two years, according to the report.
Mr. McDonnell supported a plan during this year’s legislative session that would require all state employees to pay into their pensions for the first time since 1983. A 5 percent employee contribution would have been partially offset by giving employees a 3 percent raise.
But the General Assembly balked at the proposal, instead opting to require employees hired before July 1, 2010, to pay 5 percent of their salaries into their pensions in exchange for a 5 percent raise. Those hired after that date already had to pay into the system.
“Looking at the [problem] of who shares the cost is always controversial,” Mr. Stosch said. “Getting employees to understand what’s in their best interest is part of the challenge.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Israeli army tweets image of rockets over London to justify Gaza invasion
- Mitch McConnell: 'Every crazy liberal in the country' knows me
- Mitch McConnell: Detain children 'humanely,' send them home
- Rep. Ed Royce: International community must take a stand against Vladimir Putin
- Netanyahu spokesman: Israel 'looking into' Hamas claim of captured soldier
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- More immigrants deported from New Mexico center
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Ron Paul: U.S. partly to blame for Malaysia Airlines disaster
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- Pro-Russia rebel commander suggests passengers died days before Malaysian flight
- Vladimir Putin pressured to aid Ukraine plane crash probe, rein in rebels
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq