- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Judge denies bid to block Bolling’s tiebreaking vote
RICHMOND — A Richmond judge has denied a Democratic state senator’s bid to block Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling from casting tiebreaking votes in the General Assembly’s Upper Chamber — clearing the way for, theoretically, complete GOP dominance on Capitol Square.
Sen. A. Donald McEachin, Henrico Democrat, had sought a temporary injunction to prevent Mr. Bolling from casting such votes on tax matters, election of judges, constitutional amendments, and the all-important task of organizing committees, which determine which bills make it to the floor and which perish before a full vote.
“For this court to intervene at this point before the legislative process has even begun would be tantamount to issuing an impermissible advisory opinion,” wrote Judge Beverly W. Snukals. “The declatory judgment statute was not intended to vest the courts with authority to render advisory opinions, decide moot questions, or answer inquiries which are merely speculative.”
Come January, the legislature will be evenly split at 20 Democrats and 20 Republicans. The GOP has declared its intention to govern as a majority party, a notion Democrats have decried as an unfair power grab.
Judge Snukals also cited the separation of powers provision in the state Constitution, writing that “in essense, the Plaintiff is asking this Court to invade the province of the General Assembly, the legislative arm of government. … in this case, this Court cannot intervene in the normal operating procedures of the Senate and enjoin one of the highest officials in the Commonwealth from performing his constitutional duties.”
Lawyers for Mr. McEachin had argued that Mr. Bolling, though he presides over the Senate, is, in fact, a member of the executive branch and therefore cannot cast tiebreaking votes on items like committee membership and taxation matters that require a “majority of members elected.”
But Deputy Attorney General Wesley G. Russell Jr., arguing for Mr. Bolling, said that the position as lieutenant governor granted him sovereign immunity from any sort of injunctive relief, and that the lawsuit was couched in the premature assumption that such matters would necessarily end in a 20-20 tie.
Judge Snukals wrote that because Mr. McEachin was unlikely to succeed on the merits because of the ripeness and the separation of powers issues, there was no need for the court to consider a sovereign immunity plea.
“The public interest would not be served by having a deadlocked Senate that is unable to agree on organization,” she wrote.
The ink was barely dry on the order before the partisan sniping began.
“The Senate Democratic caucus will continue to explore all its options, both legal and procedural, to resolve this issue in a way that reflects the actual outcome on election day, not an arrogant partisan power grab, totally to the benefit of one Party that does not reflect a majority of the Senate,” Mr. McEachin said.
He said that while he disagreed with the decision, it was purely procedural.
“The judge determined that the matter was not ripe for a final determination on the merits,” he said. “The opinion was not a decision on the merits of whether the Lieutenant Governor can vote on Senate organization.”
Meanwhile, Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Pat Mullins said that a lawyer as skilled as Mr. McEachin “should have seen this coming a mile away.”
“If Senator McEachin is willing to file such a frivolous lawsuit, I can’t help but wonder if the next phase of this temper tantrum is for he and his Democrat colleagues to flee the state like their counterparts in Wisconsin did,” he said. “Hopefully, Democrats will accept the judgement of Virginia’s voters — and now the courts — with a measure of grace.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
- Obama urged to enforce ban on importing military-style firearms
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.