- Associated Press - Sunday, December 18, 2011

FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) — An intelligence officer who worked with the Army intelligence analyst accused of giving U.S. secrets to the WikiLeaks website said Sunday that the soldier was considered to have an especially high understanding of enemy threats in Iraq and had to be trusted to keep the material he saw private.

The description of Pfc. Bradley Manning from one of his officers came at the beginning of the third day of a military hearing to determine whether he should be court-martialed. He is accused of giving WikiLeaks a trove of government material while working as an intelligence analyst in Iraq in 2009 and 2010, including Iraq and Afghanistan war logs, State Department cables and a military video of a 2007 American helicopter attack in Iraq that killed 11 men.

Capt. Casey Fulton testified for the prosecution that Pfc. Manning had a “top secret” security clearance, enabling him to view a wide range of classified material. None of the material posted on WikiLeaks was classified higher than “secret.”

Capt. Fulton said Pfc. Manning was regarded as having a better understanding than other analysts of enemy threats in Iraq. She said analysts such as Pfc. Manning, known as all-source analysts, were trained to synthesize intelligence from a wide array of intelligence sources.

Capt. Fulton said analysts are trained not to disclose classified information and are not allowed to burn classified information onto CDs for personal use, but she said it was impossible to supervise them 100 percent of the time.

“You have to trust that they’ll safeguard the material the way that they’ve been taught,” she said.

Capt. Fulton also said that sometime before April 2010, when WikiLeaks released a video featuring an Apache helicopter attack, she saw a similar clip on a workstation computer in Baghdad. She said Pfc. Manning later showed her that the WikiLeaks clip and the one Capt. Fulton had seen were the same. Pfc. Manning is suspected of leaking the video.

The hearing began Friday at Fort Meade outside Washington and could run several more days. The Army says it may take several more weeks for the commander of the Military District off Washington to decide whether Pfc. Manning will be court-martialed.

Maj. Gen. Michael Linnington may choose other courses, including administrative punishment or dismissal of the 22 counts against him, including aiding the enemy. He also could add more charges based on evidence produced at the hearing.

Pfc. Manning, who turned 24 Saturday, could face life in prison if convicted.

The Obama administration says the released information has threatened valuable military and diplomatic sources and strained America’s relations with other governments. Pfc. Manning’s lawyers counter that much of the information that was classified by the Pentagon posed no risk.

Among the first issues to arise during weekend testimony was whether Pfc. Manning’s sexual orientation is relevant to the case against him. His lawyers maintained that his status as a homosexual in the military before the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” contributed to mental and emotional problems that should have barred him from having access to sensitive material.

The defense revealed that Pfc. Manning had written to one of his supervisors in Baghdad before his arrest, saying he was suffering from gender-identity disorder. He included a picture of himself dressed as a woman and talked about how it was affecting his ability to do his job and even think clearly.

Maj. Matthew Kemkes, one of Pfc. Manning’s lawyers, asked Special Agent Toni Graham, an Army criminal investigator, whether she had talked to people who believed Pfc. Manning was gay or found evidence among his belongings relating to gender-identity disorder. The condition often is described as a mental diagnosis in which people believe they were born the wrong sex.

Agent Graham said such questions were irrelevant to the investigation.

Story Continues →