- Man arrested in car bomb plot at Kansas airport
- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
MOVIE REVIEW: ‘War Horse’
Weigh saying ‘neigh’ to this Spielberg offering
At his best, Steven Spielberg is a justly praised master — a Hollywood legend with the awe-struck eyes of a child and the worried soul of a parent, a superb action filmmaker with a gift for iconic set pieces and an unblinking chronicler of wartime violence keenly aware of the sacrifices that come with even the greatest victories. At his worst, Mr. Spielberg is a self-indulgent cinematic pop star — a sentimental emotional manipulator, a purveyor of blockbuster excess, and a mawkish historical dabbler who shields his audience from the hard truths he sometimes hints at.
Viewers will find both Spielbergs in “War Horse,” his adaptation of Michael Morpurgo’s 1982 young adult novel about a boy and a horse in the midst of World War I. Although there are extended flashes of his anguished brilliance trotting through the second half, it’s the worst Spielberg — the sentimentalist whose overprotective streak undermines his own most powerful ideas — that takes the reins in this movie.
In one sense, “War Horse” is an adolescent’s war movie — a sort of Happy Meal-sized version of “Saving Private Ryan” set in World War I. There’s a young man who throws himself into battle, a tour of the war-torn European countryside, and brutally powerful scenes of trench warfare. After the boy, Albert (Jeremy Irvine), follows the horse, Joey, off to war, we watch the two travel separate paths through the heart of the conflict.
But in another sense, it’s a story of eternal romance, about a boy and a horse destined to be together but drawn apart by the horrors of the 20th century’s first great conflict. Indeed, Albert’s deep attachment to the horse is cast as a sort of gushing preteen infatuation. The movie frequently resembles one of the many contemporary romances in which the wild energies of some young woman help a sad-sack lad find himself.
Thank goodness, then, that Albert gets less screen time than his equine lover; the bulk of the movie’s middle section follows the horse rather than the boy as custody changes hands from British officer to French farmers to lowly German soldiers and back again. There are virtues to this sort of aimless narrative grazing: If you don’t like one story, wait a few minutes — another’s bound to come trotting by.
In each story, though, the idea is the same: Joey’s purity of spirit brings out the simple humanity in each owner. But the mysterious and instantaneous insistence by so many strangers that this horse is somehow special is vexing at best, offensive at worst, especially when, in a climactic scene, a military doctor leaves a tent full of wounded soldiers to care for Joey. The horse is special and the people are not? Indeed, the movie provokes the question: What’s so special about this story at all?
At this point in his career, Mr. Spielberg can make any movie he wants. Why this one? The truly harrowing depictions of early trench warfare in the second half suggest one possible motivation, but Mr. Spielberg never provides a fully convincing answer. It’s clear that, like Albert, he loves this horse, but also that he can’t explain why.
★ ★ ½ (out of four)
TITLE: “War Horse”
CREDITS: Directed by Steven Spielberg; screenplay by Lee Hall, Richard Curtis
RATING: PG-13 for horrific war violence
RUNNING TIME: 146 minutes
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- Obama birther theories float as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- North Korea's official report on Jang Song Thaek
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- James Bond: The spy who is really an alcoholic
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Topics will include politics, religion, race, culture, and anything else that needs to be discussed...
Our Choice: Individual responsibility and self-government or the abandonment of the American Revolution
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.
John Glaser turns his pen toward foreign policy and international relations around the world
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow