Column: Don’t bet against NFL casino ownership

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Leaving Las Vegas can’t ever be easy for Steve Wynn, especially on an NFL weekend when rubes with fat wallets can’t wait to empty them on their favorite team in his casinos.

But there he was in Foxborough, Mass., taking in a Patriots game and discussing what could be a very profitable business venture with New England owner Robert Kraft and a few selected area residents.

Casinos may be the only thing that pays off better than owning an NFL team. So maybe it’s only natural that Kraft and Wynn want to team together to build a $1 billion gambling resort just beyond the end zone at Gillette Stadium.

Gambling and football, they just seem to go together. They have ever since Vegas bookies figured out a way to make lines that made NFL games interesting even when they were mismatches.

Much like Sunday, when the Patriots were huge favorites over the woeful and winless Indianapolis Colts. Wynn and everyone else in the stadium knew they would win, but would they manage to cover the 21-point spread that oddsmakers set in the sports books at Wynn’s opulent Las Vegas casinos?

They didn’t, though even the existence of a point spread would never be mentioned by the NFL. The league is so virulently anti-gambling that it won’t even allow Super Bowl commercials that suggest such decadent activity.

But now one of its most prestigious and powerful owners wants to get in on the action. Kraft wants to capitalize on a new state law authorizing three resort casinos in Massachusetts by helping build one in the shadow of the stadium where his Patriots play.

He’s not alone. The Miami Dolphins reportedly also are considering a casino on property adjacent to the team’s stadium if Florida decides to expand its gambling options.

The fact that league rules technically prohibit casino ownership won’t likely matter in this rush for riches. There’s too much money at stake, and too many billionaires chasing it for some antiquated policies to stand in their way.

Not to mention an owner who is so chummy with a Vegas casino mogul that he invited him to Foxborough to watch a game and explain to the locals that a huge casino complex is just the thing their town needs.

Anyone sniff a hint of hypocrisy here?

The people who are paid to promote Las Vegas certainly can. They tried to launch their iconic “What Happens in Vegas Stays in Vegas” campaign by advertising during the 2003 Super Bowl, only to be rejected by the moralists at the NFL. If that wasn’t enough, the league banned NBC from promoting its hit show “Las Vegas” on primetime broadcasts after it landed “Sunday Night Football” for fear someone might see a casino.

Only recently did the NFL throw the city a bone and allow Las Vegas to be mentioned in ads during games. But the league still prohibited specific casinos to be identified, and did not allow any references to gambling of any kind.

The NFL has long made it clear it would never allow a team in Las Vegas. Don’t be surprised, though, if it allows casinos near its stadiums.

To be sure, Kraft’s plan to build a resort that would lure gamblers from the Boston area may never come to fruition. Several hundred Foxborough residents rallied against the proposal Saturday on the town common, and any zoning change to allow the casino would likely have to pass by a two-thirds majority vote.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash player