- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- Ukraine will compete in Sochi Paralympics despite Crimea conflict
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
- De Blasio’s wife irks former mansion chef with ‘servant’ remark
SIMMONS: Ethics bill needs time to get it right
The D.C. Council needs to slow down.
Lawmakers are simply moving too fast on ethics-reform legislation, to which they gave a preliminary nod Tuesday.
The vote is being touted as a comprehensive effort to tighten and raise the bar on the ethical standards in city hall. But amid criminal probes, ongoing public outcry and potential recall efforts, it’s obvious that lawmakers are attempting to hand voters and other stakeholders a glass that’s barely half full.
Sure, the measure tightens financial disclosure rules and addresses the use of constituent service funds. But those are only two issues on a long list of brow-raising concerns that were exposed by sunlight shortly after the mayor and council were in seated in January.
Are cronyism and nepotism the twin hallmarks of the Mayor Vincent C. Gray administration, and did he pull a Rod Blagojevich by selling a job to a 2010 light-weight contender?
Did council Chairman Kwame R. Brown misuse campaign funds?
Did council member Harry Thomas Jr. misuse tax dollars?
Shouldn’t the council have impeachment powers?
How can voters get a full refund?
Those questions and others quickly led to a crisis of confidence within city hall.
Lawmakers would be wise to wait for legal action on some of the former questions. But with all deliberate speed, they should take action on the final two if they want to regain public confidence.
All they need do is look to the Constitution and Capitol Hill, which offer clear guidelines and ground rules on censuring, expelling and impeaching the nation’s highest echelon of elected leaders. To be sure, it’s messy business, but politicians who cast dishonor and disrepute stink to high heaven.
Yet, the D.C. measure fails to address how to rid the council of an unethical and/or unlawful legislator.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: Obama's birthday gift to Barry
- SIMMONS: Obama's 'Brother's Keeper' a big-government initiative that lacks faith
- SIMMONS: Andy Shallal a CEO suited for the District
- SIMMONS: It's high time someone made sense on D.C. pot plan
- SIMMONS: D.C. weighs job-killing per-employee 'service fee'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- CPAC 2014: Huckabee says government impeding religious liberty
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again