- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Labor board: Boeing case dropped, but more possible
Question of the Day
While the NLRB agreed Friday to drop the politically-charged case over the aerospace giant building a plant in right-to-work South Carolina, the board’s top lawyer left the door open to file similar cases and seek similar remedies in the future.
“If we were ever faced with a similar pattern, we might well issue a complaint,” NLRB Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon said in a conference call with reporters.
The NLRB-Boeing dispute, which threatened to shutter a $1 billion manufacturing plant the company has built in South Carolina, became a major political issue, with business groups, congressional Republicans and a number of GOP presidential hopefuls charging the board had overstepped its power by favoring the complaint filed by the company’s machinists’ union.
The move to drop the case was made possible after Boeing and the International Association of Machinists reached a deal on a new four-year labor contract last week. While the two sides were bargaining, the union had accused Boeing officials of illegally shifting work on the company’s new Dreamliner 787 to the North Charleston, S.C., site in retaliation for past strikes in the company’s Washington state manufacturing hub.
Business groups and Republican lawmakers applauded the decision Friday, but were similarly cautious about what the fact the dispute got as far as it did might mean for the future.
Randy Johnson, a senior vice president on labor issue at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, welcomed the decision to drop the complaint, but argued Friday that “more needs to be done to prevent this outrageous overreach in the future.”
The NLRB case “will stand as one of the great examples of pro-union activism and government overreach in history,” Mr. Johnson said.
Republicans in the House have introduced bills designed to curb the powers of the NLRB in the wake of the Boeing complaint, arguing recent actions by the board have been far too heavily titled toward the interests of labor unions — a key part of Mr. Obama’s political base.
“Today’s decision confirms the NLRB’s action against Boeing was nothing more than a shameless campaign to bully an American employer,” House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairman John Kline, Minnesota Republican, said in a statement. “While I am pleased Boeing and the union agreed to a resolution, thousands of jobs in South Carolina and many more across the country were threatened by the NLRB’s decision to pick winners and losers in a labor dispute.”
Mr. Kline said the threat of similar complaints down the line could inhibit investment and job growth.
“Countless employers and workers are now wondering whether they too will fall victim to similar tactics by Big Labor and its NLRB allies.”
“In withdrawing the complaint against Boeing, Mr. Solomon threatened American companies saying he would go after them if ‘faced with a similar situation,’ ” said Fred Wszolek, spokesperson for the Workforce Fairness Institute spokesman. “Clearly, labor’s cronies at the NLRB don’t understand it is not the job of bureaucrats to dictate to American companies where they can and cannot invest resources and locate operations.”
But Mr. Solomon contended that the NLRB, now dominated by President Obama’s appointees, had never — as critics charged — asserted the authority to tell companies where they can operate or invest.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tim Devaney is a national reporter who covers business and international trade for The Washington Times. Previously, he worked for the Detroit News, Grand Rapids Press, Portland Press Herald and Bangor Daily News. Tim can be reached at email@example.com.
- Dysfunction, disarray at Homeland Security management cited in IG's report
- GM's Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- Treasury sells last shares in 'Government Motors'
- U.S. businesses reach out quickly to partners in Iran
- General Motors ending Chevrolet sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq