- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Hill brawl awaits Obama’s 2012 budget
Lawmakers bent on cutting costs
When President Obama rolls out his 2012 budget Monday, it will sound the starting gun on a three-month sprint that will determine just how serious Washington is about translating its cost-cutting rhetoric into serious action to reduce staggering deficits.
Mr. Obama’s budget marks the beginning of the 2012 budget fight, but it also sets the tone for how Congress tackles the debt ceiling, likely in April. With the federal government still operating on stopgap spending, Congress and the White House still have to hash out the 2011 spending bills that are more than four months overdue.
At stake is nothing less than the fiscal health of the country.
“The next few months are absolutely critical,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “The process of putting the budget pack on track will either begin in earnest, or politicians will collectively bury their heads in the sand and continue their partisan bickering, pushing off the moment of change to beyond the next election cycle and potentially risking that a fiscal crisis hits us before we make changes on our own terms.”
Mr. Obama’s budget will propose cutting some domestic programs and trying to lower the long-term deficit but will fall short of the spending cuts proposed by Republicans.
News reports say the president’s plan also will recommend ending Bush-era tax cuts for the highest earners when they expire at the end of 2012, but will leave untouched popular entitlement programs that drive federal spending more than any other part of the budget.
House Republicans on Friday unveiled their own bill to finish 2011 spending. The proposed measure would cut $58 billion from 2010 spending - some of the biggest one-year reductions in history.
Among their cuts, they zero out dozens of government offices, reduce spending on the Environmental Protection Agency, eliminate earmarks and cut funding for public broadcasting.
“We’re broke. What’s really dangerous is if we continue to do nothing and allow the status quo to stay in place,” Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday. “When are we going to get serious about cutting spending?”
Democrats responded by warning that when “you try to make cuts this deep to a slice of the budget this narrow, it is almost impossible to do responsibly.”
“They want to use a meat ax instead of a smart, sharp scalpel,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat.
Whatever the case, with Republicans running the House and Democrats running the Senate, it has become clear that Congress will have a tough time bridging the philosophical divide over spending and deciding which of their competing parochial interests should be put on the chopping block.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers launched a pre-emptive strike last week in response to news reports that indicated Mr. Obama intends to cut $2.5 billion from the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Programs (LIHEAP), a federal block grant program that provides states with annual funding to operate home energy assistance programs for seniors and low-income households.
Sens. Jack Reed, Rhode Island Democrat, Olympia J. Snowe, Maine Republican, and 29 of their colleagues sent a letter to Jacob J. Lew, director of the Office of Management and Budget, asking him to reconsider “this decision in light of the economic hardships facing low-income families and seniors.”
“The consequences of this proposal will disproportionately affect New Englanders, who are already facing a 25 percent increase in home heating oil this year,” Mrs. Snowe said in a statement.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Freedom Summit unofficial start to '16 GOP primary
- Eric Cantor falls hard from good graces of conservatives
- Eric Cantor pressured to skip conference by moderate GOP group
- GOP congressman: Empower states to legalize marijuana
- Gov. Jindal: GOP 2016 White House nominee should be a governor
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.