- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Unequal protection from ruin
Health care reform’s biggest backers now want out
Question of the Day
Twenty-eight of these United States - encompassing 164 million people, 53 percent of the American population and 285 Electoral College votes - are suing the federal government to stop Obamacare. This litigation challenges the constitutionality of Obamacare’s mandate that individuals purchase health insurance. The U.S. Supreme Court likely will decide once and for all if the Constitution’s Commerce Clause empowers Congress to force Americans to conduct commerce.
Shattering the Obamacare Death Star, however, may require slamming it from multiple directions. Hence, an additional legal strategy should address this law’s apparent violation of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.
Obamacare is not being enforced equally. As of Feb. 9, the Obama administration had granted 915 waivers, mainly to influential organizations, major companies and pro-Democrat labor unions. Those less lucky or connected have a different option: Obey Obamacare.
According to the Health and Human Services Department (HHS), the waiver recipients claim that complying with new “annual dollar-limit requirements” would cost their group health plans “either a large increase in premiums or a significant decrease in access to coverage.” But unlike the objective income brackets that trigger diverse tax rates, “large” and “significant” are subjective criteria. This gives HHS bureaucrats ample opportunity to treat the insured unequally.
Major waiver recipients and their enrollees include the Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund (20,500), Service Employees International Union Local 25 (31,000), Darden Restaurants (34,000), Aetna (209,423), CIGNA (265,000) and the United Federation of Teachers (351,000). Union members represent 43.1 percent of the 2,443,047 enrollees included in these waivers.
“Obamacare was sold as all benefit - no downside,” Rep. Cliff Stearns, Florida Republican, said Wednesday at a waiver-focused House oversight hearing. And now, “2.5 million people literally need to be protected from the devastating effects of Obamacare.”
“The selective dispensations to Obamacare’s mandates that Mr. Obama so far has given to various special interests - especially his union friends - fly in the face of the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause,” says Roger Pilon, the libertarian Cato Institute’s vice president for legal affairs. “But they’re just the other side of the ‘Cornhusker Kickback,’ the ‘Louisiana Purchase’ and other last-minute shenanigans that Obama and congressional Democratsemployed to get this travesty passed in the first place.”
“The very interests who supported this law and helped ram it through Congress are now applying for waivers,” said Betsy McCaughey, president of Defend Your Healthcare (defendyourhealthcare.us), at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington on Saturday. “If government has the power to grant waivers, it has the power to deny them and destroy any business. Americans never should have to slink and slither to the White House for exemptions, like supplicants.” Ms. McCaughey will ask Mr. Obama to give waivers to everyone who requests them via her website.
While Democrats hail this new law as the greatest medical innovation since the tongue depressor, these 915 waivers may be the most compelling argument against Obamacare yet. After Democrats ignored the screams of the populace and jammed this catastrophe down our throats, they argued that Americans soon would love this gargantuan law.
“It’s very obvious that people have a lack of understanding of our health care reform bill,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said in August. “The more people learn about this bill, the more they like it.”
Democrats have it backward. With Obamacare, familiarity breeds contempt. Nearly one year since its enactment, 57 percent of Americans want Obamacare repealed, while just 38 percent disagree, according to a Feb. 12-13 Rasmussen Reports survey of 1,000 likely voters.
Meanwhile, rather than clamor to accelerate Obamacare, unions, corporations and other prominent players secure the priceless waivers that are their passport out of this mess. Instead of cheerful passengers aboard a luxury liner, those who know Obamacare best resemble terrified Vietnamese - huddled atop the U.S. Embassy, praying for seats aboard the last chopper out of Saigon, just steps ahead of the marauding Viet Cong.
Deroy Murdock is a syndicated columnist and media fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Calling sentence disparities unfair, Obama pardons 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness