- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
House GOP pushes through historic spending cuts
Question of the Day
Flexing their new large majority in the House, Republicans early Saturday morning pushed through a bill that cuts more than $61 billion from last year’s spending levels, setting up a showdown with Senate Democrats, who have vowed to block it, and President Obama, who has said he’ll veto it.
The bill, which funds the government for the rest of fiscal 2011, marks the deepest dollar-amount discretionary spending cuts in history, and Republicans said it makes good on their campaign promise to return spending to pre-stimulus levels.
Along the way, the House considered hundreds of amendments and held separate roll-call votes on about 100 in a herculean debate that spanned from Mr. Obama’s new health care law to environmental rules to whether the military should be sponsoring NASCAR racing teams.
“Our action serves as the historic turning point from a Congress that ignored the will of the people to a Congress that responds to the will of the people,” said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican. “This is the first of many steps by the House to trim spending, live within its means, and get people back to work.”
The 235-189 vote was deeply partisan. Not one Democrat voted for the measure, and they were joined by three Republicans who voted against it, including some conservatives who had wanted to see deeper cuts.
Democratic leaders said they, too, want to rein in the deficit, but said cutting spending now, and so deeply, would be to “jam on the fiscal breaks.”
“It will slow economic growth, increase unemployment and thereby increase the deficit,” said Rep. Norm Dicks, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee.
He and other Democratic leaders said they would rather have a spending freeze at current levels, and wanted to offer that plan as a substitute for Republicans’ bill, but the rules for debate prevented them from bringing it to the floor.
Earlier this week the Social Security Administration warned employees that if the cuts are signed into law, it will have to furlough some employees.
But Republicans, pointing to a projected record $1.6 trillion deficit looming this year, said a freeze is not good enough to get the country onto a sustainable path.
During the freewheeling, four-day debate the House repeatedly voted — often with bipartisan support — to overturn some of Mr. Obama’s policies of the past two years: They voted to block implementation of last year’s health care law, to prevent the administration from enforcing global warming rules and, in one overwhelming vote, to stop new limits on for-profit schools.
The House also voted to stop any federal funding from going to Planned Parenthood, a network of abortion and women’s health clinics; killed some pet projects that top leaders had protected for years; and voted to block the Federal Communications Commission from issuing “net neutrality” rules.
All told, 67 amendments passed.
The spending bill is already nearly five months overdue, since the fiscal year began Oct. 1. Democrats, who controlled all the levers of government last year, failed to pass a budget or any of the dozen regular spending bills, instead using a stop-gap measure to fund the government through March 4.
Republicans’ bill would spend at a rate of $1.2 trillion per year, which is $61 billion less than 2010 levels, and at least $100 billion less than what Mr. Obama had called for spending this year.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Norway expects imminent 'concrete threat' from ISIL terrorists 'within days'
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq