- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
- De Blasio’s wife irks former mansion chef with ‘servant’ remark
- Russia’s neighbors shiver amid Putin’s Cold War moves in Ukraine
- New SAT: The essay portion is to become optional
- Military group can’t march to honor the fallen at Boston Marathon due to security changes
- Senate passes bills deleting ‘retarded’ from laws
- China announces biggest military hike in 3 years: We are not ‘boy scouts with spears’
Collusion between unions and officials
Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin and his state’s Republicans have to rein in the cost of government employee benefits. Rather than focusing on what the unions can and cannot do, perhaps a better approach would be focusing on what government officials can and cannot do.
The problem has arisen because of collusion between unions and elected officials at the state, county and local levels. The unions contribute to the campaigns of elected officials and the elected officials pay them back by agreeing to generous benefits. It’s easier for the officials to grant benefits than salary increases, because the salary increases appear in the current year’s budget and have to be paid for, while the benefits - particularly defined benefit retirement plans - must be paid for by their successors, long after those who granted them are out of office. But the bill eventually comes due.
The answer is to make it against the law for government officials at every level - from the governor to local school boards - to agree to any contract that promises a future benefit that is not paid for in the current fiscal year. No more kicking the can down the road.
Rather than the open-ended commitment to defined benefit retirement plans under which a worker retires at 60 or 65 and collects a percentage of his last year’s salary for the rest of his life, government workers would have to switch to 401(k) plans or earned benefit plans. The contributions - whether from the government or workers - would be paid for in the current year and nothing could be left for future generations to pay.
The government-employee benefits mess was created by two parties that saw it in their individual interests to ignore the burden they were placing on future generations. Unions have a right to participate in the political process, but government officials shouldn’t be allowed to pay for union support by bargaining away the future.
Avon Park, Fla.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Get Breaking Alerts
- Back to the Future: HUVr Tech marketing video goes viral with hoverboard release tease
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: Bush to blame for Ukraine
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Russian lawmaker wants to outlaw U.S. dollar, calls it a Ponzi scheme
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- CPAC 2014: GOP optimism, agenda emerge at CPAC
- 1M kids stop school lunch due to Michelle Obamas food standards
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's flawed Mideast 'peace' plan
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Foreign policy would distract Obama from social hour
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Hit Putin where it hurts over Ukraine