- Rep. Tim Murphy: GOP knew HealthCare.gov would be an ‘unmitigated disaster’
- Political speak: Planned Parenthood dumps ‘pro-choice’ for ‘women’s health’
- U.S. attorney warns Cuomo not to interfere with anti-corruption probes
- Investigators reach Ukraine jet crash site
- Ohio gives Obama a thumbs down; Hillary Clinton tops GOP all-stars: poll
- Jesse Ventura suggests suit not over; HarperCollins could be next
- ‘No American is proud’ of certain CIA tactics: State Department
- Drug-filled drone crash outside S.C. prison sends police on alert
- GOP to Obama: Take your ‘golf cap off’ and get down to coal country
- Hamas cleric tells Jews: ‘We will exterminate you’
Mideast revolts stir Filipinos’ memories
Uprising in 1986 deposed Marcos, but corruption and poverty persist
Question of the Day
MANILA, Philippines | From the fist-pumping crowds to the anguished dictators, the pro-reform revolts reshaping Arab history resemble the 1986 Philippine uprising that booted a strongman 25 years ago. But the similarity ends with the killing of protesters from Tunisia to Libya.
The four-day “people power” revolt a quarter-century ago that Filipinos commemorate this week saw multitudes of civilians and rosary-clutching nuns and priests mounting a human barricade against tanks and troops to bring down dictator Ferdinand Marcos with little bloodshed as the world watched in awe.
The democratic triumph has been hailed as a harbinger of change in authoritarian regimes in Asia and beyond. Since then, democratic revolutions have ended autocracies and military rule in South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan and Indonesia in relatively peaceful feats that seemed unimaginable before 1986.
The Philippines also became a showcase of post-dictatorship pitfalls that revolt leaders say could provide lessons to Arab nations, which will have to grapple with daunting uncertainties once the euphoria wears off.
Aside from democracy, little has changed in this Southeast Asian nation of 94 million. It remains mired in corruption, appalling poverty, rural backwardness, chronic inequality, long-running Marxist and Muslim insurgencies and chaotic politics. A restive military often tries to undermine civilian rule.
Imelda Marcos, the dictator’s widow once reviled for the extravagance as epitomized by her vast shoe collection and eye-popping diamonds, has made a political comeback after winning a seat in the House of Representatives last year. Her daughter won as governor of the father’s northern provincial stronghold of Ilocos Norte. A son and Marcos‘ namesake won a Senate seat and has not ruled out a future run for the presidency.
“It’s 25 years after, and we’re still almost where we used to be,” former President Fidel Ramos said.
Mr. Ramos’ crucial defection from Marcos as deputy military chief along with then-Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile in February 1986 sparked the strongman’s rapid downfall, after a two-decade reign condemned for widespread human rights abuses and alleged plunder of the economy.
While most of the uprisings rocking the Arab world appear to be leaderless - fueled by mobs of protesters often mobilized with the help of social-networking sites - Filipinos rallied in 1986 around pro-democracy icon Corazon Aquino, whose husband, an opposition leader, was assassinated three years earlier by soldiers under Marcos.
Aquino had agreed to challenge Marcos in a snap election in which she claimed victory, despite widespread cheating by pro-Marcos forces, and called for civil disobedience. Cardinal Jaime Sin, a hugely influential church leader in the predominantly Roman Catholic nation, helped summon the mammoth crowds against Marcos by appeals on church-run radio.
On Feb. 25, Marcos was sworn in for a new term, but hours later, after it had become clear that the United States, his Cold War ally, would not intervene to prop up his rule, he gave up. U.S. military aircraft flew the dictator and his family to exile in Hawaii. Crowds swarmed into the Malacanang presidential palace and gawked at the opulence enjoyed by their former ruler.
Suddenly thrust into power, Aquino’s initial years focused on rebuilding democratic institutions and crafting a new constitution. However, congressional elections in 1987 brought back many of the landed political dynasties that ruled provinces like fiefdoms through patronage.
Aquino’s loose political coalition of Marcos military defectors and liberal politicians soon frayed, causing discord in her Cabinet. Disgruntled troops launched seven failed coups that scared away investors. With poverty remaining pervasive, many Filipinos continued to stream out in search of work abroad, draining the country of its best brains and hardest workers.
In the absence of radical changes, what effectively took place in 1986 was “a change of faces” in the same system, political analyst Clarita Carlos said.
“Across the board, the same problems persisted: poverty, the sad state of education, political patronage,” she added.
TWT Video Picks
By Ted Cruz
Israel saves its enemies; Hamas endangers its friends
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- NAPOLITANO: Is the president incompetent or lawless?
- GOP report sees ties between rich donors, green 'nonprofits'
- House votes to sue President Obama over claims of presidential power
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world