Obama, Chamber of Commerce look for common ground
WASHINGTON (AP) — After two years of vociferous conflict over health care and financial regulations, President Obama and the nation’s top business lobby — the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — have entered into something of a detente.
Mr. Obama is scheduled to deliver a speech Monday at the chamber, a first for him. Not four months ago, he attacked the huge, Republican-leaning trade organization for failing to disclose donors to its $32 million congressional political campaign. “Their lips are sealed,” Mr. Obama said at the time, “but the floodgates are open.”
The White House and the chamber now are highlighting areas of common ground and expressing a joint commitment to creating jobs. Mr. Obama has stressed his new economic agenda, featuring competitiveness, innovation, energy and entrepreneurship. Disagreements linger and are no less vehement, but they no longer are the subject of loud legislative battles and big-dollar advertising campaigns by the chamber.
White House officials say Mr. Obama’s speech will not break new policy ground, nor will he offer an olive branch. But in his radio and Internet address Saturday, Mr. Obama said he planned to tell businesses they have an obligation to stay in the United States, hire American workers and invest in the nation’s future.
The speech — part nudge, part courtship — is a message to business that is hardly limited to the Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Obama met with some of the nation’s top 20 executives in December, gently prodding them to get cash off their balance sheets and use it to create jobs. Also in December, he negotiated a compromise with Republicans on tax cuts that won him some grudging boardroom support.
It wasn’t always so. During his first two years as president, Mr. Obama was known to play a populist hand, referring to bankers as “fat cats,” rebuking corporate lobbyists and casting the insurance industry as an antagonist in the health care debate. So bitter were the fights, they overshadowed areas of solid agreement, including the chamber’s support of Mr. Obama’s 2009 economic stimulus plan and the bailout of automakers General Motors and Chrysler.
The Republican wave in the November election wrested control of the House of Representatives from the Democrats. It created a need for more compromise in the legislative process and for the type of outreach Mr. Obama did not seek — and Republicans did not offer — when Democrats were in total control.
Mr. Obama needs the centrist cloak that the business community offers. The chamber can benefit by softening the sharp edges it developed fighting the health care overhaul and tighter financial rules.
Both sides need each other for policy, as well. The chamber can help the Obama administration win congressional support of trade deals, particularly a recently renegotiated pact with South Korea. Both the White House and the chamber face Republican opposition to increased spending on public works, from roads and bridges to wireless networks.
On trade, on infrastructure and — mostly — on regulations, Mr. Donohue said, companies want certainty from the government.
“The reason the companies are sitting on $2 trillion worth of cash is because of uncertainty,” he said.
Mr. Obama long has had allies in the private sector. He has given corporate CEOs advisory roles, and throughout his first two years he has held periodic lunches with executives at the White House. But until now, he had not brought them into his inner circle.
Last month, that changed. Mr. Obama named William M. Daley, a former commerce secretary and JPMorgan Chase executive, as his chief of staff. He promoted Gene Sperling, a known quantity to the business community, as his new chief economic adviser. He gave high-profile assignments to General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt and AOL founder Steve Case.
In one of his first calls in his new post, Mr. Sperling called Mr. Donohue, who welcomed him with characteristic bluntness: “Glad to have someone over there I’m comfortable sparring with at 10 a.m. and sitting down with at 2 p.m. to work on policy.”