- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
EDITORIAL: Protect workers from union bosses
It’s time to pass the Secret Ballot Protection Act
Question of the Day
Labor unions can’t persuade Congress to destroy workplace voting rights, but their Obama-appointed lackeys at the National Labor Relations Board do their dirty work anyway. Twice in the past six weeks, the NLRB has sided with union bosses over ordinary workers, smothering the ideal of secret elections.
On Friday, the NLRB threatened to sue four states whose voters recently passed referendums guaranteeing the right to secret-ballot elections for union organizing. The NLRB says the new laws in Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah would deny unions a second method of organizing allowed by federal law, namely by showing “majority support by signed authorization cards or other means.” In practice, these “other means” could well include sending teams of bullies to individual workers to “persuade” them to sign cards requesting representation by a particular union.
The NLRB argues that the 1935 National Labor Relations Act - which allows an employer to “voluntarily recognize” unions formed by that method - “pre-empts” state laws saying otherwise. Legal battles over federal pre-emption have snarled federal courts in recent years, but the Obama administration has a curious record on the subject. When a federal law would pre-empt plaintiffs lawyers from big-money suits, the administration sides with the lawyers against federal power; when federal law would pre-empt a state’s voters from democratically choosing labor or immigration laws, the administration sides with federal power, against the voters. Either way, the White House sides with its powerful allies, no matter what voters desire.
The earlier NLRB decision was even more objectionable. On Dec. 6, the board sided against workers in favor of a form of collusion between a corporation and a union the workers had not chosen. Before workers at the Dana Corp. formally selected the United Auto Workers union, the UAW and Dana’s executives signed a letter of agreement allowing the UAW to unionize those workers without a secret-ballot election. If this is permitted, any unscrupulous union bosses, without approval from workers, could approach corporate leaders and agree to cheaper labor terms than another union might demand. Having secured a company’s cooperation, union bosses then could send its goons around collecting “card check” approvals from workers while claiming the contract is basically a done deal.
“This sets up what can only be called ‘sweetheart unions,’ ” Peter List, proprietor of the authoritative LaborUnionReport blog and a former longtime union activist, told The Washington Times. An earlier post on his blog quoted former NLRB member John Raudabaugh calling the decision “paternalistic, patronizing and wrong.” Mr. Raudabaugh said the NLRB ruling “surely will be overturned on appeal.”
Congress can and should take this discretion away from the NLRB. For several years, new House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline, Minnesota Republican, has led dozens of members pushing the Secret Ballot Protection Act, which would amend the 1935 law by guaranteeing secret ballot rights to workers nationwide. The act would override the two NLRB decisions and end backroom deals. Passing the act is the best, quickest way to ensure employees’ free choice.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: This is no bargain
- EDITORIAL: The new payday inequality
- EDITORIAL: Turbulence at 30,000 feet
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's favor factory
- EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama's pretentious obsession
Latest Blog Entries
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation