- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
House GOP works on health ‘solutions’
Targets ban on abortion funds
Question of the Day
Wasting no time, House Republicans moved quickly ahead Thursday with their own overhaul of the nation’s health care system, commanding key committees to get to work and launching a fresh attack on federal policies regarding abortion funding.
One day after voting to repeal President Obama’s health care law, the House approved a resolution directing four committees to write bills aimed at preserving some of the more popular parts of the Democrats‘ law, such as requiring coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, while also addressing the GOP’s desire to curb malpractice lawsuits and prohibit taxpayer funding of abortions.
“Having taken that action to wipe the slate clean, we are now moving on to the far more challenging task of crafting real solutions for the American people,” Rep. David Dreier, California Republican, who now chairs the House Rules Committee, said on the House floor.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs brushed off the resolution’s passage, but also noted that “many of the goals that they espouse in that bill are the current law of the land, like ensuring that people aren’t discriminated because of a pre-existing condition.”
“That actually exists, it’s called the Affordable Care Act,” he said.
Despite the opposition to the repeal effort, there is a general sense that between the court challenges lodged against the law and the bills introduced to change it, the health care act will be tweaked in some fashion.
Perhaps the easiest possible change will involve the ‘1099’ tax reporting requirement for businesses, set to kick in next year. Lawmakers agree that the reporting requirement places too much of a burden on small businesses, and three Democratic senators wrote a letter to House Speaker John A. Boehner on Thursday urging him to pass a bill rolling back that requirement.
Republicans‘ “replace”resolution, which passed on a near party-line 236-181 vote, gives the committees 12 goals for reform, and challenges the president’s claim that the law he signed in March preserves a patient’s ability to keep his or her health plan, creates jobs and reduces the tax burden.
The resolution doesn’t set a deadline for the committees to report back with legislative proposals, but House Republicans already have introduced one part of their “replace” agenda,the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act,” which calls for an end to the taxpayer funding of abortions and to provide conscience protections for doctors.
Rep. Christopher H. Smith, New Jersey Republican, who is leading the effort, told The Washington Times the measure would ensure that federal funding for the high-risk insurance pools, community health centers and health insurance exchanges in Mr. Obama’s law does not go to subsidize abortions.
This past summer, the Obama administration issued a new regulation that prohibited state high-risk pools from covering elective abortions, but Mr. Smith said that needs to be written into law.
“It is completely up to the call of the secretary of Health and Human Services and the president if they want to [stop federally funding abortions],” Mr. Smith said. “That’s no guarantee.”
Rep. Diana DeGette, Colorado Democrat, said the proposal was an intrusion on women’s abortion rights and argued that the Hyde Amendment already bars the use of certain federal funds for abortions.
“This bill represents the biggest infringement on a woman’s right to choose in our lifetime,” Ms. DeGette said in a statement.
Like the “repeal and replace” push, the abortion bill faces an uphill battle because it must pass the House and the Democrat-controlled Senate and then avoid Mr. Obama’s veto pen.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Chris Christie leading N.H. GOP presidential field; Mitt Romney lingers large
- Muslims give Obama high marks over first half of 2014
- Big 2014 for incumbents so far
- Texas Gov. Rick Perry: Obama showed up after Hurricane Sandy, why not the Texas border?
- Jeff Flake: House should have passed Senate immigration bill
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Senate majority leader practices politics of personal destruction
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: 'We cannot afford to wait on Congress' for immigration
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- Obama seeks brisk passage of border children funding bill
- Va. Democrat reportedly seeks nude shots of Kendall Jones
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: 'Get yourself some firearms'
- Bloomberg: Pro-gun towns must lack roads
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- Amid border crisis, Obama to take 15-day vacation in Martha's Vineyard
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs