- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Beijing isn’t green
Question of the Day
Patrick J. Michaels’ Tuesday column on NASA laboratory head James E. Hansen’s anti-democracy rant about how the Chinese dictatorship can better fight climate change was revealing about the mindset of green fanatics in the United States (“China-style dictatorship of climatologists,” Commentary). It also exposed Mr. Hansen’s ignorance about actual Chinese policy. Beijing will pursue energy efficiency where it makes sense, but it has never accepted global warming as a constraint on economic growth.
China’s position has been clear at the United Nations climate negotiations. Just before the 2009 Copenhagen conference, it led India, Brazil and South Africa in a common front against any imposed U.N. cuts on emissions and rejected the use of trade barriers as a way to impose penalties on those who don’t reduce emissions.
Before last month’s Cancun climate conference, the ruling Communist Party’s newspaper, the Global Times, editorialized, “China’s greenhouse gas emissions probably will not peak until 2035. … Its national conditions have made it fundamentally impossible for China to take action in accordance with the low-carbon standards of the Western countries. … It is China’s national interests to protect its right to develop.”
Beijing’s stance at the U.N. - supported by the entire developing world - has blocked any anti-growth climate treaty. For that, we should be thankful.
WILLIAM R. HAWKINS
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye ’16 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Cutler wins endorsement from gun control group
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business