- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
GOP disputes deficit effect of health law repeal
Democrats cite CBO estimate claiming $230B surge of red ink
Question of the Day
Congress’ official scorekeeper said Thursday that the House Republicans’ first major bill, which would repeal last year’s health care law, would increase deficits by $230 billion over 10 years - setting off a firestorm of criticism from Democrats who said the GOP is already walking away from its pledges of fiscal restraint.
In a letter to newly minted House Speaker John A. Boehner, the Congressional Budget Office said a preliminary estimate shows that Democrats’ massive health care overhaul’s cost-cutting measures would have reduced federal spending overall, which means “repealing that legislation would increase budget deficits” from 2012 through 2021, and beyond.
The report threw an early kink into Republican attempts to fulfill campaign promises, and provided Democrats with ammunition to use against the GOP less than 24 hours after it took control of the House and added new members in the Senate.
“Now we have a situation where the Republicans say: ‘We want to repeal health care reform, and we want to ignore its deficit impact,’ ” said Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat. “Not only would repeal of health care reform add to our deficit, it would dump more than 30 million Americans from coverage who will be protected by our new health care reform act.”
But Republicans held their ground, defending their decisions to hold a repeal vote next week and to brush aside the CBO estimate that Democrats’ law reduces the deficit and repealing it would increase the deficit.
“Mark my words: This thing will not reduce the deficit,” said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul D. Ryan, Wisconsin Republican. “I am very confident in saying that. They have a piece of paper from CBO that they contorted to suggest that it does. But that’s not reality.”
Republicans will begin floor debate on the repeal bill Friday, with a vote scheduled next week.
When Democrats enacted their health care plan, they included hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes and in spending cuts to existing government health care, which CBO said would more than offset the increased spending and lead to a reduced deficit.
So under that accounting, repealing the law would actually increase the deficit.
But Republicans said Democrats structured their law to front-load taxes and backload the spending, and are counting on future spending cuts that even CBO said may not materialize.
“I do not believe that repealing the job-killing health care law will increase the deficit,” Mr. Boehner told reporters. “CBO is entitled to their opinion, but they’re locked within constraints of the 1974 Budget Act. Listen, even the actuaries at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid have made clear that this bill will not save the kind of money that was predicted earlier.”
Mr. Ryan said he thinks the Democrats’ health care law will lead to $700 billion in deficits.
Still, during last year’s health care debate top Republicans praised CBO as the gold standard for evaluating legislation, and on Thursday, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, Maryland Democrat, told Republicans they cannot pick and choose when to accept the nonpartisan agency’s numbers.
“Sometimes we like what they say; sometimes we don’t. But when you don’t like the call on the field, it is not part of the rules of the game that you throw the referee off the field and substitute your judgment,” Mr. Van Hollen said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Perdue, Nunn square off in race for Georgia's open Senate seat
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Alison Lundergan Grimes hits Mitch McConnell over jobs
- Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff locked in dead heat
- Georgia Senate race heats up as Kingston, Perdue ready for runoff
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of politicizing business
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq