Senate Democrats said Thursday they will continue to seek Republican cooperation on proposed rule changes to make it tougher for the minority party to use filibusters and other procedural tactics to block majority bills.
But with Republicans staunchly opposed to tinkering with the filibuster, which they say is among the only tools they have to stop legislation they oppose, Democrats say they’re prepared to forge ahead alone to reform the system.
“The rules have been abused” by Republicans, said House Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat. “We hope that the Republicans see the light of day and are willing to work with us. If not, we’ll have to do something on our own.”
Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, who met Wednesday with Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee to try to hash out a compromise over the proposed rule changes, said he believes a bipartisan agreement is possible.
“I would delude anyone to say we’re there, but we’ve had good discussions,” Mr. Schumer said. “At the same time, we’re making the point clear that there are certain things that … it would seem are beyond dispute.”
“So we’re working on two paths: One, to build support for the principles [Democrats] believe in, and second, to try and work out a compromise with the Republicans if we can. That would be our preference.”
“We’re willing to discuss it,” he said. “But I think anything that begins to move the Senate into the direction of becoming of the House of Representatives would be inappropriate, and we would fight that.”
A filibuster — a catchall term for delaying or blocking a majority vote on a bill by lengthy debate or other procedure — takes 60 votes to overcome and to proceed to a final vote. That means as few as 41 minority members can block legislation. The Senate now includes 47 Republicans.
The filibuster process doesn’t exist in the House, where simple majorities rule.
Sen. Tom Udall, New Mexico Democrat, has proposed legislation to end the minority party’s right to filibuster the start of debate on a bill. Senators could still attempt to block final passage of a bill under his plan.
Senators who filibuster — unlike now — would be required to hold the floor with speeches in a style similarly used by actor Jimmy Stewart in the classic 1939 film “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.”
Mr. Udall’s measure also calls for an end to the practice that allows a single senator to place a “secret hold” on measures —another blocking tactic routinely employed by the minority party.
As a compromise to Republicans, Mr. Udall’s plan would guarantee the minority the right to offer amendments to bills.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
A round eye’s guide into the Chinese world.
This column will cover anything that has anything remotely to do with the game of baseball, from the game itself to mid-summer trades to offseason moves.
Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.
World's Ugliest Dog Contest
Spelling Bee finale
Marines train Afghan soldiers
Rolling Thunder 2013
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal