- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s same-sex marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
- U.N. rights chief: Flight MH17 downing possible war crime
- Attack on park in Gaza war kills 10, mostly children
- Calif. protesters to block Israel-owned ships at Port of Oakland
- Obama to give Africa $38M, but tells young leaders: Stop ‘making excuses’ for economy
KELLNER: Is Murdoch the last newspaper mogul?
Legal issues aside, his news pages have spawned content for digital consumers
Question of the Day
Mr. Murdoch, whatever his sins, is a newspaper mogul. There aren’t many of those folks around. Without such benefactors, good luck keeping a newspaper in business.
Tweet all you want, but real news still comes largely from newspapers and the media they’ve spawned: radio, television, news services and, of course, the Internet. Without newspapers, the Drudge Report would be sheer drudgery; Gawker.com would have much less to gawk at.
Sustaining a daily newspaper is no easy, or inexpensive, task. The very wealthy people or corporations who operate in this arena generally have a purpose, apart from making money, in doing so. It may be a family legacy, a commitment to public service or even - gasp - the advocacy of a point of view. Strictly looking at the numbers, however, newspapering is a tough business, and it’s only getting tougher.
As costs for ink, paper and transportation rise, newspaper ad revenues are falling. On July 18, McLean-based Gannett Co. (where I once worked as a reporter in its Government Media Corp. unit), disclosed that in the second quarter of 2011, its U.S. “advertising revenues declined 7.2 percent and at Newsquest, the company’s operations in the [United Kingdom], advertising revenues were 10.3 percent lower.” Decreased advertising revenue means less money to invest in the news product.
Almost 30 years ago, in 1982, Al Neuharth, then Gannett’s CEO, poured millions into creating something unique for the United States: a national, daily, general-interest newspaper. USA Today worked because it met an unmet need, but where is the 2011 USA Today? Instead of spending $300 million to create a modern-day online successor to Mr. Neuharth’s bold move, AOL passed the money over to Arianna Huffington, who now controls editorial policy for the online service. That may or may not work out for AOL, but many fans were dissatisfied that an entrepreneur known for “aggregating” (read: summarizing and linking) other people’s work is now in charge.
Bill Gates and Microsoft Corp. put millions into Slate, an online journal that was supposed to supplant newspapers - at least digitally - but it was unprofitable for Microsoft and is now wholly owned by The Washington Post Co. Mr. Gates isn’t known to be hunting for any other media properties, nor is Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Indeed, the most recent backer of a major digital news initiative, the iPad-only venture called the Daily, is the now-scorned Mr. Murdoch.
You can count the number of wealthy media entrepreneurs on your fingers, and still have digits to spare. Some are dead (Robert Maxwell), or fighting legal issues (Conrad Black), or essentially out of the game (Sam Zell). Denver’s Philip Anschutz made a valiant effort in print, but his Examiner franchises live chiefly in cyberspace, not at one’s front door each morning.
Among the very few still standing is Mr. Murdoch, whose fabled love for ink on dead trees is a testimony not only to his family’s roots - his late father nurtured a daily newspaper in Adelaide, Australia, into a huge business, providing the impetus for global expansion - but also to his commitment to the medium. In New York, Boston and San Antonio, Mr. Murdoch stepped in to buy flagging properties and try to revive them. His Texas experiment failed and the Boston Herald is now in private hands. But in New York, and in Boston, too, there are daily newspapers today that might not have been there but for Rupert Murdoch.
Whatever happens in the now-infamous phone hacking scandal that has gripped Mr. Murdoch’s British papers, and whoever is responsible for it, will doubtless come out in the days ahead. If it forces some kind of breakup of his media conglomerate, those of us who cherish newspapers and appreciate the folks who fund their operation may well wonder if we shall ever see his like again.
Mark A. Kellner writes a weekly technology column for The Washington Times. He has never been employed by any News Corp. enterprise.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Mark A. Kellner is a religion columnist for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- KELLNER: Troubling tones in too many religious debates
- KELLNER: Did a prominent rabbi find Jesus — and does it matter?
- KELLNER: 'Failed' states among most dangerous lands for Christians
- KELLNER: Positive thinking key to Horowitz's 'One Simple Idea'
- KELLNER: The year in religion offered hope, peril
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
Get Breaking Alerts
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- D.C. police chief orders officers not to arrest legal gun owners carrying weapons in public
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- DeSean Jackson working on offensive cohesiveness with Redskins teammates
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public