- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
- 68,000 more file for unemployment — in one week
- Michigan bans in-state insurers from covering abortion
- Nancy Pelosi tells Democrats to pass budget: ‘Embrace the suck’
- Key Obamacare official: Last two months much harder than anyone hoped
- Sen. Mike Lee: We must stop ‘the prez’ from acting like the queen
- George Bush consoles Alabama kicker Cade Foster: You will be stronger
- Megachurch pastor with ties to Obama commits suicide
EDITORIAL: Sun sets on lunar glory
America throws in the towel on manned space exploration
Question of the Day
On Thursday morning the space shuttle Atlantis landed at Cape Canaveral, marking the end of the U.S. manned space program. The date coincided with the 42-year anniversary of mankind’s first steps on the moon. Now the eagle has landed for good.
The Apollo 11 lunar landing was one of the greatest achievements in human history. It had been only 43 years since Robert H. Goddard launched the first primitive liquid-fueled rocket at his Aunt Effie’s farm in Auburn, Mass. As a boy, he dreamed of the possibilities of space flight and of one day reaching the moon. Goddard passed away in 1945, but by then rocket technology, spurred by war, was advancing exponentially.
The Soviet Union scored the first great achievement in human space flight when Yuri Gargarin vaulted into the void in April 1961. But the next month, President Kennedy raised the stakes with a dramatic vision: “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal,” he told Congress, “before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth.” It was a bold act of leadership, but the risk engendered the very sense of commitment required to achieve the task. As Kennedy made clear, it was not one man who will go to the moon, “it will be an entire nation.”
The space race crystallized a national effort engaging the country’s vision, technological prowess and physical bravery. It also elevated the United States in the eyes of the world. At a time when America was wracked with conflict at home and abroad, and beset by critics from across the political spectrum, the quest for the moon unified people in a sense of wonder and anticipation. There was no greater outpouring of global good will for America than on the day the Stars and Stripes were planted on the lunar surface.
Unfortunately, the drama of the space race quickly gave way to an almost routine acceptance. Most people gave the shuttle program little thought, except when tragedies like the Challenger and Columbia disasters brought the dangers of space exploration into grim focus. But these moments passed, and space receded into the background. The end came with a pen stroke through a budget line item.
The passing of the manned space program means less to those who were born after Americans first set foot on the moon. To them, the event is a distant glint of a golden age made more lustrous by time. For many older Americans, there is a tangible sense of loss. It’s strongest in that generation who as children clustered around the television at night watching the shadowy black-and-white images of Neil Armstrong leaving the fragile-looking lunar module, descending to the moon’s surface and uttering his immortal words as he made one giant leap for mankind. It was a moment of awe, of pride and achievement. Now these children are middle aged and live in a very different world than the one they were born in.
The sense of national unity and commitment has faded. Americans face new uncertainties, new competitors and have lost the faith that the nation’s best days still lay before it. With the end of the manned space program comes the realization that we live under a moon that has slowly receded beyond our reach.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: This is no bargain
- EDITORIAL: The new payday inequality
- EDITORIAL: Turbulence at 30,000 feet
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's favor factory
- EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama's pretentious obsession
Latest Blog Entries
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
Get Breaking Alerts
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Inside the Ring: China targets Global Hawk drone
- Fake interpreter at Mandela service: 'Sorry,' I have schizophrenia
- Selfie at heart of Obama fiasco to stay secret
- Creator of 'Selfies at Funerals' blog retires after Obama flub: 'Our work here is done'