- ‘Tis the Season: London florist creates $4.6 million Christmas wreath
- No tailgating allowed at Super Bowl XLVIII
- Pentagon to transport African troops to Central African Republic
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend’s shopping jumps to his death
- Ukraine leader to talk with protesters; Washington urges caution
- Pope Francis: A nun saved my life
- Israeli P.M. Netanyahu backs out of Mandela funeral
- Elian Gonzalez makes first trip outside Cuba since custody battle
- U.S., British intelligence agents enter online sci-fi world to spy on gamers
- Sarah Palin to host the outdoors show ‘Amazing America’
SGT. SHAFT: Download forms from the Department of Defense website
Via the Internet
* Go to a Web Browser (e.g. Google).
* Type in DD-149 and hit enter.
* Start typing in the blue lines on the form.
* Save your entries by clicking on “Save As,” name your document and save on your computer’s local drive.
That’s all there is to it.
The Sarge is dumbfounded by Sen. Patty Murray’s and three of her Senate colleagues’ support of legislation that would allow blind citizens to work for less than the minimum wage. In a letter to Ms. Murray, National Federation of the Blind Executive Director for Strategic Initiatives John G. Paré Jr. wrote as follows:
Dear Senator Murray:
I am writing regarding proposed language in the draft Workforce Investment Act (WIA) legislative package that reverses the progress of blind Americans toward first-class citizenship, full integration into society and competitive employment; specifically, Title V, Section 511, “EMPLOYMENT OF INDIVIDUALS WITH SIGNIFICANT DISABILITIES AT WAGES BELOW MINIMUM WAGE.” In 1938, when every other employee in America was guaranteed the workforce protection of a federal minimum wage through the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Section 14(c) of this act denied people with disabilities this protection. The language found in Title V, Section 511, of the proposed reauthorization is a tacit endorsement of Section 14(c) of the FLSA and its antiquated contention that people with disabilities cannot be competitively employed. Since our founding in 1940, the National Federation of the Blind, the nation’s largest organization of blind Americans, has fought against the misconception that blind people cannot be productive employees, and we have made significant strides toward a correct understanding of the true capacity of the blind and other workers
with disabilities. Most notably, the National Industries for the Blind, a network of sheltered workshops with a history of employing blind workers at subminimum wages, has essentially eliminated the need for a Special Wage Certificate for its member agencies by adopting a policy of employing blind workers at the federal minimum wage or higher.
Also, over the past few decades, we have seen the passage of progressive disability legislation to move people with disabilities closer to the goal of competitive integrated employment. Section 14(c) of the FLSA is neither consistent with this general trend nor consistent with current findings that even people with the most significant disabilities can be competitively employed. Section 14(c) of the FLSA has not previously been referenced in the Rehabilitation Act, and it should not be linked in any way to this reauthorization. Language endorsing the payment of subminimum wages to disabled employees simply has no place in a piece of legislation that is supposed to pave the way for disabled Americans to be integrated into the competitive workforce. It is in direct conflict with the intent of the legislation.
I speak regularly with blind people from across the nation, and I can tell you that their universal belief is that the payment of subminimum wages must be forbidden. The language in Title V, Section 511, is an attempt to protect youth with disabilities from being inappropriately steered toward sheltered employment and a life of low expectations rewarded with subminimum wages. However, aside from the specific requirements for prevocational and transitional services, Title V, Section 511, simply restates the current law of Section 14(c) of the FLSA. Moreover, the language in the draft providing an exception where “the individual has been working toward an employment outcome…for a reasonable period of time without success” and will “likely not be successful,” could result in subminimum wage employment being newly considered as a service of vocational rehabilitation. This language will not solve the problem of abuse of Section 14(c); it will make it worse. The goal of protecting youth with disabilities from unnecessary employment at subminimum wages would be better accomplished by providing for prevocational and transitional services elsewhere in the draft without referencing the FLSA at all. I am asking, on behalf of all blind Americans, that you do everything in your power to see that Title V, Section 511, is removed in its entirety from this legislation, along with any other reference to Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. I thank you for your attention to this critically urgent and important matter.
However, kudos to Ms. Murray, who is a Washington state Democrat, for her recent speech on the Senate floor urging her colleagues to pass the critical health care and benefits investments included in the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs spending bill the Senate is considering this week. Among many other things, the bill includes lifesaving investments in Traumatic Brain Injury and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder research as well as mental health care for those struggling with the invisible wounds of war. The bill also makes a significant investment in preparing the VA for the influx of new Iraq and Afghanistan veterans while supporting housing opportunities and care for older veterans.
“No matter what fiscal crisis we face, no matter how divided we may be over approaches to cutting our debt and deficit, no matter how heated the rhetoric here in Washington D.C. gets, we have to keep our commitments to our veterans and service members,” Ms. Murray said. “We have to move this bill forward, and we have to provide those who wore — or are wearing — the uniform with the peace of mind that we are keeping up our promise to them.”
Funding broken down by base appears below:
Naval Station Bremerton — $13,341,000
Naval Station Kitsap — $121,844,000
Fairchild Air Force Base — $27,600,000
Joint Base Lewis McChord — $331,300,000
Naval Air Station Whidbey Island — $25,000,000
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's widow seeks information regarding husband's benefits
- SGT. SHAFT: Divorced veteran seeks help getting full retirement benefits back
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's wife seeks help for husband with multiple sclerosis
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's spouse will be able to continue on TRICARE Prime until age 65
- SGT. SHAFT: Veteran's medical claim held up at VA
By Tom Fitton
New photos confirm the attack's coordination and its cover-up
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Israeli P.M. Benjamin Netanyahu backs out of Nelson Mandela funeral
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a 'wealthy white men' racist word
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- WOLF: The president's other Obamacare lies
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- MILLER: Brady Campaign says Colorado recalls due to NRA, not grassroots opposition to gun control
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Crystal Wright is a black conservative woman living in Washington, D.C.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow