- ‘Welcome to the edge of freedom’: Biden’s boots touch down in DMZ
- Obama: Hole U.S. ‘digging out of’ requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
Lawsuit dismissed against funding of stem-cell research
Foes of embryo work eye appeal
A lawsuit that had threatened to end the Obama administration's funding of embryonic stem-cell research was thrown out Wednesday, allowing U.S. researchers to continue to use them over protests that the work relies on destroyed human embryos.
The lawsuit claimed that research funded by the National Institutes of Health violated the 1996 Dickey-Wicker law that prohibits taxpayer financing for work that harms an embryo. But the administration policy allows research on embryos that were culled long ago through private funding.
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, chief of the federal court in Washington, last year said the lawsuit was likely to succeed and ordered a stop to the research while the case continued. But responding to a swift protest from the Obama administration, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals here quickly overturned Judge Lamberth's injunction and said the case was likely to fail.
The attorneys who brought the suit said in a statement that they are weighing their options for appeal. They pointed out that Judge Lamberth said in his ruling in favor of the administration that he is bound by the higher court's analysis.
"This Court, following the D.C. Circuit's reasoning and conclusions, must find that defendants reasonably interpreted the Dickey-Wicker Amendment to permit funding for human embryonic stem-cell research because such research is not 'research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed,' " Judge Lamberth wrote.
Researchers hope one day to use embryonic stem cells in ways that cure spinal-cord injuries, Parkinson's disease and other ailments. Opponents of the research object because obtaining the cells destroys a human embryo.
Though current research is using cells culled long ago, opponents say success and the promise of federal subsidies would provide an incentive for new embryo destruction. Proponents say the research cells come mostly from extra embryos discarded anyway by fertility clinics.
President George W. Bush also permitted stem-cell research, but limited the availability of taxpayer funds to embryonic stem-cell lines that were already in existence and "where the life-and-death decision has already been made."
Mr. Obama's order removed that limitation, allowing projects that involve stem cells from already-destroyed embryos or embryos to be destroyed in the future. To qualify, parents who donate the original embryo must be told of other options, such as donating to another infertile woman.
The Obama administration's rules expanded the number of stem-cell lines created with private money that federally funded scientists could research, up from the 21 to 128 and counting.
Obama adviser Stephanie Cutter wrote on the White House blog that Judge Lamberth's ruling is good news for patients suffering from diseases that could potentially be treated by stem-cell research.
"For too long, patients and families have suffered from debilitating, incurable diseases, and we know that stem-cell research offers hope to millions of Americans across the country," she wrote. "President Obama is committed to supporting responsible stem-cell research, and today's ruling was another step in the right direction."
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Obama tries to calm Israeli fears over Iranian nuke deal 'not based on trust'
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- KNIGHT: Can the ACLU force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions?
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Craigslist killers: Police say newlyweds stabbed man for thrills
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Opinion, analysis, and musings on politics, pop culture, reinvention, and the resultant flotsam and jetsam floating around the right-of-center quadrant of the Left Coast.
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!