MILLER: Honey, I shrunk the Happy Meal

Fast-food giant caves to federal pressure and makes kids’ dinner more bland

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

For 32 years, kids have enjoyed the “Happy Meal” from McDonald's. Parents would often trade these toy-stocked box meals for a night off cooking or the promise of good behavior on a long car ride. That could change as Big Brother seeks to solve the supposed childhood obesity epidemic by dictating how food should be made and marketed to anyone under the age of 17.

The world’s No. 1 fast-food burger joint has been battered into downgrading its beloved Happy Meals so they will now automatically include apple slices (minus the caramel dipping sauce) and a smaller order of french fries. This change will shrink the meal’s calories by 20 percent.

The culprit is an inter-agency working group made up of the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Agriculture, which came up with “guidelines” to force companies to limit “the saturated fat, trans fat, added sugars and sodium in foods marketed to children.”

It takes three government agencies to figure out what every parent knows already: Kids like junk food more than healthy food. McDonald's already knows it, too. The company found that while 88 percent of its customers are aware that fries in a Happy Meal can be swapped for apple slices, only 11 percent chose the healthier option.

If the overpaid bureaucrats had actually stepped into a McDonald's, they would have realized any kid left to himself is just going to chuck the fruit into the garbage can.

Washington can mandate all the healthy foods it wants, but if parents aren’t enforcing smart choices, kids will find a way to eat junk.

Parents used to deal with tubby tots by banning junk food from the home, turning off the TV and sending them outside to play. Now, our nanny government insulates kids from the tiniest dangers, even as small as a peanut.

The occasional Happy Meal is not supersizing our kids. The real problem is absentee parents who allow video games to substitute for exercise and mac ‘n’ cheese to take the place of roast chicken and green beans. Uncle Sam makes a lousy surrogate parent; his new regulations aren’t going to make anyone healthier.

Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts