- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
I-Gaming plan caps losses at $250 per week
Wins unlimited in online project
Question of the Day
Players can lose only as much as $250 a week in the D.C. Lottery’s upcoming online gambling program, but there is no limit on how much they can win on a hot streak, said Buddy Roogow, executive director of the city-run D.C. Lottery and Charitable Games Control Board.
“There’s no way for us to put a cap on what you can win,” he said.
If the District successfully implements the program, known as I-Gaming, it will be the first jurisdiction in the country to offer gambling over the Internet. Still, before players see dollar signs flash before their eyes, they have a few limitations to consider.
The maximum weekly deposit of $250 limits the potential for big payouts, Mr. Roogow says.
Blackjack odds would be similar to those in real casino play, and Bingo is at fixed odds. The odds will be posted to the public and tend to skew in favor of the house, Mr. Roogow told D.C. Council member Tommy Wells, Ward 6 Democrat, during a hearing on the program last week.
The poker game Texas Hold ‘Em is a different scenario because gamers play against each other and the lottery will make its money on the “rake,” or fixed fee that goes to the house.
“We don’t care who wins and who loses, in a sense,” Mr. Roogow said. The lottery has not set the rake amount yet, but it is typically about 5 percent of the pot.
Mr. Roogow says any instances of collusion in multiplayer games should be caught by software that tracks suspicious trends. It may not catch collusion in the first hand, “but it won’t take long,” he said.
Other methods of cheating, such as counting cards, are “easily defeated” through use of multiple decks and repeated shuffling in the online games, he added.
How far an individual player’s money goes depends on his or her luck and skill during periods of continuous play. No games are available during the agency’s so-called “cooling period” of 4 to 10 a.m.
The I-Gaming program has been controversial, both in plans for implementation and how it became law.
Council member Michael A. Brown, at-large independent, inserted the measure into a supplemental budget act in December rather than using the normal legislative process with public hearings.
Council member Jack Evans, Ward 2 Democrat, who held the hearing last week, says there has not been enough public input on the locations of “hot spots” or areas where the games can be played on laptops. He’s suggesting the agency slow down its plans for real betting by early fall.
Critics of the plan also are concerned about the new game’s impact on poor residents, whether gambling can take place in public buildings and if revenue projections of $13 million over four years are accurate.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- White House hits back at Republicans and tallies up Obamacare benefits
- Fake sign language interpreter from Mandela memorial admitted to psych ward
- Florida Dem senator defends NSA snooping efforts
- Calls for military pension fix grow
- La. Gov. Jindal defends suspended Duck Dynasty star
Latest Blog Entries
- D.C. to tout Obamacare among youth waiting for Air Jordans
- Sen. John Thune: Congress will restore military-retiree cuts when it gets back from holidays
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Uninsured Americans just as skeptical of Obamacare as those who have coverage
- Sen. Saxby Chambliss: Americans just aren't keen on Obamacare
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
In a world that is increasingly complex, we need to seek greater awareness of the blending of cultures and America's changing role in a global community.
Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow