- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
I-Gaming plan caps losses at $250 per week
Wins unlimited in online project
Players can lose only as much as $250 a week in the D.C. Lottery’s upcoming online gambling program, but there is no limit on how much they can win on a hot streak, said Buddy Roogow, executive director of the city-run D.C. Lottery and Charitable Games Control Board.
“There’s no way for us to put a cap on what you can win,” he said.
If the District successfully implements the program, known as I-Gaming, it will be the first jurisdiction in the country to offer gambling over the Internet. Still, before players see dollar signs flash before their eyes, they have a few limitations to consider.
The maximum weekly deposit of $250 limits the potential for big payouts, Mr. Roogow says.
Blackjack odds would be similar to those in real casino play, and Bingo is at fixed odds. The odds will be posted to the public and tend to skew in favor of the house, Mr. Roogow told D.C. Council member Tommy Wells, Ward 6 Democrat, during a hearing on the program last week.
The poker game Texas Hold ‘Em is a different scenario because gamers play against each other and the lottery will make its money on the “rake,” or fixed fee that goes to the house.
“We don’t care who wins and who loses, in a sense,” Mr. Roogow said. The lottery has not set the rake amount yet, but it is typically about 5 percent of the pot.
Mr. Roogow says any instances of collusion in multiplayer games should be caught by software that tracks suspicious trends. It may not catch collusion in the first hand, “but it won’t take long,” he said.
Other methods of cheating, such as counting cards, are “easily defeated” through use of multiple decks and repeated shuffling in the online games, he added.
How far an individual player’s money goes depends on his or her luck and skill during periods of continuous play. No games are available during the agency’s so-called “cooling period” of 4 to 10 a.m.
The I-Gaming program has been controversial, both in plans for implementation and how it became law.
Council member Michael A. Brown, at-large independent, inserted the measure into a supplemental budget act in December rather than using the normal legislative process with public hearings.
Council member Jack Evans, Ward 2 Democrat, who held the hearing last week, says there has not been enough public input on the locations of “hot spots” or areas where the games can be played on laptops. He’s suggesting the agency slow down its plans for real betting by early fall.
Critics of the plan also are concerned about the new game’s impact on poor residents, whether gambling can take place in public buildings and if revenue projections of $13 million over four years are accurate.
Mr. Brown has defended the measure, saying it will bring much-needed revenue and regulate an online gaming community that goes unchecked.
To refute a “myth” going around the city, Mr. Roogow said, the lottery has no interest in forming “gambling parlors.” The hot spots likely will be located in places such as hotels, bars and cafes and be known to the public before implementation, he said.
The spots provide a formalized way to do what people do already, Mr. Roogow said, which is “sit down, have a cup of coffee and open up a website.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- In rare bipartisan move, Congress tackles long-standing Medicare issue
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- Key Obamacare official: Last two months much harder than anyone hoped
- HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius calls for review of Obamacare rollout woes
- More than a quarter million sign up for Obamacare in November
Latest Blog Entries
- Calif.: Give 'gift of health' by pledging cash for the uninsured
- Tensions hit boiling point over Obamacare enrollment figures, error rates
- Young, uninsured adults vital to Obamacare are not keen on enrolling: New Harvard poll
- Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox will promote Obamacare at Mall of America
- HealthCare.gov employs a new look once again
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow