- Associated Press - Friday, June 10, 2011

BONN, GERMANY (AP) - Climate negotiators are exploring “constructive and creative” solutions so that wealthy countries keep trying to reduce greenhouse gas emissions even when binding commitments expire next year, the U.N. climate chief said Monday.

The expiry in 2012 of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which bound nearly 40 countries to specific emission reductions targets, looms as delegates from 184 nations seek agreement now on combating global warming.

Hopes for an overarching climate accord, which fell flat at 2009 Copenhagen climate summit, remain dim as negotiators in Bonn spend the next two weeks preparing for another major climate conference in Durban, South Africa, starting Nov. 28.

A key obstacle is the fate of the Kyoto protocol.

Countries generally have fallen into camps of rich and poor on the issue. Developing countries insist the Kyoto obligations be extended and new targets adopted. Industrial countries say they want emerging economies to accept similar binding commitments.

Three countries that fell under the Kyoto mandate _ Japan, Canada and Russia _ have said they will not renew their commitments after they expire in 2012. The United States was never part of Kyoto.

But Christiana Figueres, head of the U.N. climate change secretariat, said negotiators are trying to move outside of the rich-poor boxes.

“Countries are being much more constructive and creative,” she told reporters at the start of a two-week negotiating session. “We don’t know yet where it’s going to lead, but there is a very healthy atmosphere of really listening to each other.”

Most countries want to find a formula that also embraces the United States, but the U.S. delegation affirmed it would accept treaty commitments only if developing countries like China and India do as well.

“The U.S. is committed to a legally binding outcome that would engage all major economies,” said Jonathan Pershing, the chief delegate. “We are not committed to any outcome which would only obligate developed countries … nor are we committed to an empty agreement merely for the sake of an agreement.”

In a sign of the complexity of the talks, the formal start of the conference was delayed by more than half a day while delegates haggled over the agenda, with several countries insisting on the inclusion of their special interests.

Saudi Arabia, for example, wanted a discussion on how it could be compensated for the loss of oil revenue.

The U.S. delegation wanted more work done on verifying that countries meet their commitments. That issue, pitting the U.S. against China, nearly caused the collapse of the last year’s conference in Cancun, Mexico, before a skeleton deal was done.

“By Durban, we should have guidelines developed for reporting and verification,” Pershing said. He linked progress on “transparency” with finalizing a Green Climate Fund, a $100 billion annual payment to developing countries to help them adapt to climate change and move toward low-carbon economies.

The deal struck in Cancun, he said, was “a balanced package which included financing and transparency.”

Story Continues →