- No tailgating allowed at Super Bowl XLVIII
- Pentagon to transport African troops to Central African Republic
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend’s shopping jumps to his death
- Ukraine leader to talk with protesters; Washington urges caution
- Pope Francis: A nun saved my life
- Israeli P.M. Netanyahu backs out of Mandela funeral
- Elian Gonzalez makes first trip outside Cuba since custody battle
- U.S., British intelligence agents enter online sci-fi world to spy on gamers
- Sarah Palin to host the outdoors show ‘Amazing America’
- CIA admits $3 billion intelligence operation was a flop
LAMBRO: Obama gets it backward
President blames nation’s job woes on innovation
In a recent interview, President Obama seemed to suggest his policies would have created more jobs if businesses had stopped finding ways to be more productive with fewer workers.
It sounded as if he was saying that if businesses were a lot less innovative and would just stop trying to produce more goods and services at a lower labor cost, we’d employ a lot more people.
In an interview on the “Today” show, host Ann Curry noted that in a persistently high-unemployment economy, “businesses have spent just 2 percent more on hiring people while at the same time spending 26 percent more on equipment. So why … have you been unable to convince businesses to hire more people?”
Here is what Mr. Obama said: “Well, I don’t think it’s a matter of me being unable to convince them to hire more people. They’re making decisions based on what they think will be good for their companies.” He added that the economy was growing again, but not fast enough to bring the unemployment rate down to normal levels.
“The other thing that happened, though, and this goes to the point you were just making, is there are some structural issues with our economy where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient with a lot fewer workers. You see it when you go to a bank and you use an ATM; you don’t go to a bank teller. Or you go to the airport and you’re using a kiosk instead of checking in at the gate.”
This caught the attention of Donald J. Boudreaux, a professor of economics at George Mason University, who wondered if Mr. Obama was saying that if businesses were a lot less efficient and much more labor-intensive, a lot more people would have jobs.
“With respect, sir, you’re complaining about the source of our prosperity: innovation and the increases it causes in worker productivity,” Mr. Boudreaux said in an open letter to the president that appeared on the free-market economics website Cafehayek.com.
“With no less justification - but with no more validity - any of your predecessors might have issued complaints similar to yours,” going all the way back to the days of President Grant in the 1870s.
“Do you, President Obama, really wish to suggest that the innovations you blame for thwarting your fiscal policies are ‘structural issues’ that ought to be corrected?” he asked.
What Mr. Obama appeared to be complaining about is the ability of American industry and businesses to produce more, sell more and, yes, export more, while cutting their labor costs.
The greatest economic myth, perpetrated by labor unions, liberal economists, political demagogues and the network news media is that America doesn’t make much of anything anymore.
In fact, we make and sell more than ever before. Exports are at a record level. Our labor force - at least those who have full-time jobs - has grown dramatically in recent decades. The number of people employed in manufacturing has fallen, but manufacturers produce more than ever before - even with fewer workers, lowering their unit costs. We have many more industries and small businesses, though the pace of our economic growth has slowed dramatically under the policies of the Obama administration.
Agriculturally, we have seen a dramatic decline in the number of farms and farmers over the decades. But as a result of higher hybrid crop yields and more efficient farming methods, we produce, sell and ship more than any other country and feed the world.
In the 1990s, the entire U.S. economy’s output, as measured in our gross domestic product, was about $12 trillion a year. Today, it’s $15 trillion and climbing.
“Manufacturing in the United States isn’t dead or even dying,” an Associated Press business story reported shortly after Mr. Obama took office in 2009 in the midst of the Great Recession. “It’s moving upscale, following the biggest profits, and becoming more efficient, just like Henry Ford did when he invented the assembly line” that brought the Model T within the reach of the average American.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
Get Breaking Alerts
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- WOLF: The president's other Obamacare lies
- Tech companies call for an end to NSA online snooping
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a 'wealthy white men' racist word
- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- MILLER: Brady Campaign says Colorado recalls due to NRA, not grassroots opposition to gun control