- Australian surfing magazine sorry for calling indigenous surfer ‘apeish’
- Records: Man in Fla. theater shooting also was texting
- The Putin problem: U.S. needs Russian rockets for spy satellites
- Florida cops ticket toddler in toy convertible: report
- Kerry warns of ‘very serious’ response to Crimea-Russia alliance
- Fla. Rep. Alan Grayson’s wife drops restraining order against him
- McDonald’s lawsuits filed over wages ‘stolen’ like Hamburglar steals Big Macs
- HUMPHRIES: Fight like a Democrat – An open letter to Sen. Mitch McConnell
- Florida board member shocks with ‘Heil Hitler’ salute at town meeting
- Bill O’Reilly, Chris Matthews inducted into Irish America Hall of Fame
LAMBRO: Obama gets it backward
President blames nation’s job woes on innovation
In a recent interview, President Obama seemed to suggest his policies would have created more jobs if businesses had stopped finding ways to be more productive with fewer workers.
It sounded as if he was saying that if businesses were a lot less innovative and would just stop trying to produce more goods and services at a lower labor cost, we’d employ a lot more people.
In an interview on the “Today” show, host Ann Curry noted that in a persistently high-unemployment economy, “businesses have spent just 2 percent more on hiring people while at the same time spending 26 percent more on equipment. So why … have you been unable to convince businesses to hire more people?”
Here is what Mr. Obama said: “Well, I don’t think it’s a matter of me being unable to convince them to hire more people. They’re making decisions based on what they think will be good for their companies.” He added that the economy was growing again, but not fast enough to bring the unemployment rate down to normal levels.
“The other thing that happened, though, and this goes to the point you were just making, is there are some structural issues with our economy where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient with a lot fewer workers. You see it when you go to a bank and you use an ATM; you don’t go to a bank teller. Or you go to the airport and you’re using a kiosk instead of checking in at the gate.”
This caught the attention of Donald J. Boudreaux, a professor of economics at George Mason University, who wondered if Mr. Obama was saying that if businesses were a lot less efficient and much more labor-intensive, a lot more people would have jobs.
“With respect, sir, you’re complaining about the source of our prosperity: innovation and the increases it causes in worker productivity,” Mr. Boudreaux said in an open letter to the president that appeared on the free-market economics website Cafehayek.com.
“With no less justification - but with no more validity - any of your predecessors might have issued complaints similar to yours,” going all the way back to the days of President Grant in the 1870s.
“Do you, President Obama, really wish to suggest that the innovations you blame for thwarting your fiscal policies are ‘structural issues’ that ought to be corrected?” he asked.
What Mr. Obama appeared to be complaining about is the ability of American industry and businesses to produce more, sell more and, yes, export more, while cutting their labor costs.
The greatest economic myth, perpetrated by labor unions, liberal economists, political demagogues and the network news media is that America doesn’t make much of anything anymore.
In fact, we make and sell more than ever before. Exports are at a record level. Our labor force - at least those who have full-time jobs - has grown dramatically in recent decades. The number of people employed in manufacturing has fallen, but manufacturers produce more than ever before - even with fewer workers, lowering their unit costs. We have many more industries and small businesses, though the pace of our economic growth has slowed dramatically under the policies of the Obama administration.
Agriculturally, we have seen a dramatic decline in the number of farms and farmers over the decades. But as a result of higher hybrid crop yields and more efficient farming methods, we produce, sell and ship more than any other country and feed the world.
In the 1990s, the entire U.S. economy’s output, as measured in our gross domestic product, was about $12 trillion a year. Today, it’s $15 trillion and climbing.
“Manufacturing in the United States isn’t dead or even dying,” an Associated Press business story reported shortly after Mr. Obama took office in 2009 in the midst of the Great Recession. “It’s moving upscale, following the biggest profits, and becoming more efficient, just like Henry Ford did when he invented the assembly line” that brought the Model T within the reach of the average American.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By Emily Miller
Obama is losing the debate on gun ownership, concealed-carry permits
Get Breaking Alerts
- USS Kidd sent to Indian Ocean after 'indication' of Malaysian jet crash
- F-35 secrets now showing up in Chinas stealth fighter
- Oil rig worker says he saw missing plane go down: report
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- MILLER: Law enforcement realizes good people with guns deter crime
- GOP bill tries to pull courts into fight with Obama on executive power, enforcing laws
- After three days, Redskins finally address defensive needs
- NRA shirt gets N.Y. high school student suspended
- Snowden: NSA uses fake Facebook to hack into users' computers
- Ben Carson: America's now 'very much like Nazi Germany'
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Wind power less harmful to wildlife
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Constitutional rights are God-given
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Clinton still too inexperienced for presidency
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The recipe for Asia-Pacific stability
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama delivering on 'flexibility' vow to Moscow